Oh, I dont mean you should use words Im asking you to use...i mean, that would be unconstitutional and bigoted. ;)
What country are we in? Try and keep up will ya?
And which of those links says all of Europe is covered by something ?Nationwide??
In a democracy, the people are the government. So it's the people's money.
It is no more a "human being" than an acorn is a oak tree. It does not yet have ANY of the functioning systems it takes to sustain life AS a human being. It is a "potential" human being, and that potential depends on DOZENS of factors. Until the time it achieves separateness from one specific person's body, it is still part of another human being who has rights to bodily autonomy just the same as anyone else in this country. When that is no longer the case, it is a "person" or a "human being".
Urg, what a skeeze! I hope that date of his also avoided him in the future.
The EU Commission is a selected, unelected executive branch similar to the Soviet Central committee. The EUSSR needs to go the way of the USSR and die.
why the snarkiness?
Everything is choice and decision. But we also have to accept that those choices and decisions are made from what is learned. Then we have to consider what was taught -- the person's environment.
They do when the state is using coercive power, which is prohibited. That's the part you're leaving off and being dishonest about.
I'm curious as to how one goes about establishing that something has the quality of being haphazard as a scientific endeavor.
I made the decision to change the image. It was pointed out to me that the image represented the endorsement of the Alt Right. I made the decision to change it so that my position was clear. No text was changed. The link was changed in the background it has already been discussed between Niamh and I.
So you're speaking strictly hypothetically. Kinda like being worried about being forced to marry someone of the same sex, but that's okay because you won't allow it to get to that point.
Do male comics say it on cable TV?
The universe. Our universe.
There's a dirty joke in there somewhere involving Mary.
I think it is more a form of value ethics. Utilitarian, even rule utilitarian, would pull the lever. Either because they lack rule 3 or because they define the killing of the one not as murder.
I'm not sure, but it seems that we are agreeing on something.
If religious people really wanted to be able to use their religious rules for themselves they would crave the separations crazy. Because with a true separation they would be free to deny gay people marriage for example.
And yet that's not how he was brought into office was it? No, the Fundies all claimed (and still do) that this monstrosity is "God's appointed man" for the office.
I'm ok with girls working out around me. What I do not like is when they look at me like I'm some piece of candy or something.
He seems to be under the delusion that one needs computers and touch screens for porn to be porn.
As I said, you are getting your head handed to you.
In this context, we should be looking at religious faith, which has a different definition:
When someone starts by pretending that the fact that Darwin started with "one, or several, original forms" means reality itself is so divided, then I know you wish to be expert on reciting the status quo rather than thinking about what may actually have happened.