Hmm... nope. There is no equivalent to Fox on the left.
I can read just fine, you however....
No. You simply have to disprove the theory of how DNA came about, i.e, Darwanistic evaluation. You are conflating the existence of DNA with Darwin's theory of evaluation not to mention assuming "evolution" has to mean Darwin's idea of evaluation. These are not the same thing necessarily.
I prefer not to do either. There is a place for embellishment, particularly in the setting of storytelling for entertainment purpose. But outside of that it's not appropriate- on a resume, to woo women, whatever the case may be. And lying to deceive or do harm is much more sinister. Be precise in the words you speak, and even if you can't always be completely truthful, at least don't lie. Those who lie or embellish frequently often do so pathologically, and ultimately in many ways it becomes self-destructive, a ticking time-bomb of shame and embarrassment if you will.
Oh..oh..where can I sign up my wife for this tree ironing thing. Hell I only got 9 in.....
I'd be interested to follow your posts if you'd un "private" your account.
Seriously? As long as you remember that it was Roosevelt who had the Japanese rounded up...
your no no place?
The methods chosen for homicidal revenge between women and men are significantly different. same applies for suicide. Women very rarely shoot themselves, where as for men it's quite common. Likewise, the same applies to homicide. It's actually quite fascinating for a forensic psychology standpoint. Women by nature will typically opt for a more 'personal' means of murder than men.
I've know the verse,'Jesus Wept'.
Limits their behaviours. It would change them fundamentally given time.
Nope. It is due to the tax change and de-regulating. Donald Trump's policies are what is working. It is a sad myth to which Obama-lovers cling.
Reading Matthew Chapters one and two, confirms that your statements about Matthew's account are incorrect. Verse 18 does NOT say that Mary was already pregnant when Joseph met her. Also, your statement about "it does not say she is a virgin" is blatantly false. Verse 25 plainly tells us that Mary was a virgin until after the birth of Jesus. A rigid dogmatic assertion? Definitely, because that is what the Word says. Baseless? Hardly. Your post is refuted by the truth.
She says she's not controversial, that doesn't mean jack.
Not really and not at all.
lol i have 3 projects to do, an onboarding document to write and then format into a graphical pdf with an infograph and timeline, graphics to create for this heauxbox, a journey map to create for milestones, fix this sp list, setup Jira, and have to finish organizing my deliverable on top of meetings all week. i?m about to throw the entire week out.
>>"Thinking that Christians are some kind of threat to civil rights is ridiculous."<<