Almost. It was translated into the Septuagint as "parthenos" and the error kept perpetuating itself through time and translation. Note that the virgin birth is recounted only at Matthew 1:18-25 and Luke 1:26-38. Why this invidious omission from Mark, the earliest Gospel, and John, the latest?
I didn't give context or a reason for that hypothetical. You're the one who seems to think that violating TOS is okay depending on the context.
" I, Donald J Trump, pardon myself for money laundering."
Ohhhhhh,,, I get it... you are one of those people that believe that the jews are Israelites. As long as you believe that FABLE you are destined to Remain BLIND like most of the world is today.
There are no positive arguments for god, just wish thinking, emotions and fallacies.
and what is wisdom? you test the bible through putting it into practice. its filled with circumstantial evidence which, like a relationship...any, you text as you go on. its built that way to be a partnership. God wants a relationship. the title is..covenant partnership, God working with us in this partnership..love. God IS love it says. how else would God do it? you know?
Now Jack, you have a pretty miserable record of predicting & interpreting the Mueller investigation...
no longer respect Giuliani
Outside of 'reflex' and 'instinct'; everything a person chooses to do; including what to think, is based on their own personal reasons.
I hope you are living in a monastery then, with donated computers. XD
It is not at all important to me what you believe or why. Being honest in a debate is.
This is a matter of no importance to US. We Americans fought a war to get these lemming?s boot off our neck. Frankly, Americans marrying into a royal family attaining a title of nobility is regressive, and a national embarrassment. Even John Adam?s silly passing notions of bestowing Americans with royal titles was mocked and rebuked.
Dr. Pepper > Coke
"Do you agree that for a explanation to be considered "Scientifically Valid" it must be falsifiable?"
Laws by who? the majority? the minority? vigilante groups?
and I don't disagree with you. I'm saying to disagree outright isn't fair. If all parties are consenting and happy...who am I to say they aren't?
I am not refusing to make a distinction at all.