Why? Because God says you aren't equal to Jesus. So simple! The trouble with your post is that it is all based upon your fallible, human reasoning, and not based upon the way that God thinks.
This is the problem with many of you.
Just to be a wet blanket on all of this, it seems like the court was simply saying that the previous courts did not give enough weight to the sincerely held religious beliefs and didn't act in a neutral way. I'm not sure if their ruling actually means that the baker was in the right.
The OP gives a series of Scriptural references organized to demonstrate the main context of the coming of Jesus Christ. The question of the "righteous requirements of the law" would seem to be basically the 10 Commandments.
I just commented above that there must be more to the story. Filing a complaint is not silencing someone's voice, even if the complaint is upheld and retribution demanded.
You picked one ... out of how many total? And btw - that was not insignificant at all, as it helped pave the way for the rebirth of ancient Greek studies during the medieval period and Enlightenment. Also, Scot "gave the University of Salerno recipe for anesthesia as equal parts opium, mandragora, and henbane. He also wrote a treatise ascribing to each of the practical sciences a corresponding theoretical science of which it is the manifestation."
Possibly it is. What is your point?
I disagree. The Bible is entirely a human production based upon what is at best, a guess. Previous gods were invented to show cause for natural phenomena. This god is no different. As we study our universe, we discover the causes of those natural phenomena and they are not caused by gods.
"I think that people ?" - Sadly, this is but a mere 'opinion', at best, and no educated information concerning the subject in question. You know what they say about 'opinions', no?...
I get it.
Oh believe me, I've tried. Over and over again. But nothing.
Yes, He did that spiritually, and not by literally offing hundreds of thousands of people, those are metaphors. We know that because history would not have not noticed stuff like that and there is no historical record of it taking place.
You just keep swinging your fists in the autobody shop, and let those big bad thinkers in the front office do their job, kay?
It can also be used as plural of "majesty". The queen still uses "We" in talking first person singular...
Would be a different story if their pharmacy refused to fill scripts for opiods to MAGA hat wearers.
Again, yes it is. You keep ignoring the decisions of the Supreme Court.
Shipping it to Afghanistan would be better since odds are he'd never see it again. Plus too much time would have passed for the doctors to reattach it to his person.
you think that makes her less of a hooker?
I think technically she is his step granddaughter.
You do realize that the midterms are not until November, right, derp?
No proof of any of that...none!
= "I don't know, I have no competence whatsoever, but I blindly believe that these are all conspiracies."
I somehow don?t care about your poor assessment.
See thing about it is, most places won't let you get surgery to not have children until you're late twenties, early thirties, or have two kids.
Awesome. The largest party in the United States is the Democrats. They aren't in charge either.
Thanks for posting the stories about your Dad. Yeah, we should all have that problem of so much "Cleavage" at that young and impressionable age. ;-)
From what I have read they can but at lower rates than dogs.
How do you know? The Bible is a history from a very long time ago. How do you know that the same morals existed long before?
I can see you put a lot of effort into that comment, and I appreciate it. I just don't see how it connects.
Let me clarify that I apologize. He should want to play 48 min down 20 or 50