Just #3. Most people believers or non believers live their lives with nuance and do not follow the bible or any holy test rigidly. Yes on forums like this they may defend one side or the other but in their actual lives it is more in the middle. I know of no one (there may be someone) that is advocating for a return to biblical times because there is a direct link to god or people were closer to the divine.
He won?t be in jail if i am on that jury.
It is important to note that numerous Christian faiths were started because of other Roman Catholic crimes and concerns. From the Crusades, inquisitions and selling of indulgences to the Vatican II Council, that church tends to piss people off.
You have it exactly backward. Matthews 7:14
Watching a cable show is your source? Do you have any hard evidence?
Your bible states the earth was created in the beginning. This is wrong. Your bible states that light was created in the beginning. This is wrong. Your bible states the earth was created before the sun and other suns. This is wrong. Your bible states that plants were created before the sun. This is wrong. Your bible states that birds were created before land animals. This is wrong. Your bible states that a woman was created from the rib of a man. This is wrong.
the war in heaven is referenced from a cherry tree in the new testament ,Rev .chapter 12 verses 3 through 9 - [ Lucifer is just one of the names for Satan ] Satan is referred to as being the " anointed Cherub " in Ezekiel chapter 28 verse 14 , Satan is referred to numerous other names also ,I am not going to list them .you say the word Lucifer is Latin for the planet Venus , well Venus is the morning star , the morning star is one of the names for Satan which is another name for Lucifer .
Just because you regress back to your childhood behavior of calling people names, doesn't make you correct. You lost all hope of being taken seriously by complying to childhood conduct. Is it not arrogance that this is exactly what this man had done when asked to comply and take a seat?
You do know the story above is linked to a MSM news source?
I didn?t even know it was happening, I don?t know how I even found this thread
Modifying never seemed like a problem ?before.? (e.g., kill ?> murder) ??
There's more. But I think that's enough.
True, if you resist that is legit.
This is great news for everyone.
Been on a blues kick lately. I mean really really old blues. Thought this would work for a Throwback Thursday
Yes. Many people , including myself like choke and pukes.
I would take exception to what was stated. However, at the beginning it is quite confusing, but ultimately, makes sense after the misrepresentations are revealed.
As I understand it,
The physical world. The lack of explanation at all for our entire universe according to evolution. DNA coding sophistication. Again you have to admit a simple carton on a piece pf paper demands intelligence yet you deny it completely in the case of volumes of DNA coding. Its illogical.
No one is forcing anyone to treat the races equal, or not be a misogynist, or be fair to Jews, or not discriminate against those who remarry.
Yes. They have the right to speak that. I don't have to tolerate their views at all. Racism isn't a protected class, and if someone is refused service based on that, it isn't discrimination.
and you have nothing to prove your hate.
I have never heard that Nazareth didn't exist in the first century. I trust the consensus among experts that it did. It doesn't threaten my atheism a whole lot.
Actually, I have never heard that science supports Atheism. I don't think it does, but that doesn't mean it supports Theism. I find that Theists in an attempt to discredit Atheism, use strawman arguments about evolution and the big bang theory, which science does support. I think that is the confusion.