Actually, no one said any of that except you.
I have just reread the OP and could find no reference to him not carrying female oriented sex toys or the molds to make them customized. The precise nature of the sex toy is never mentioned. It is simply called 'his product'. His sole reason for not wanting to supply her is that she is religious. So all the other stuff is not relevant in terms of the OP.
How would you know?
Could you have improved on the mathematics of God's laws? Probably not.
No it isn't. It's just another, perhaps more subtle and poetic way of putting it. The basic idea is that death comes to all of us and in death all men are equal. Death does not discriminate. A dead king is just as dead as a dead pauper.
Why would you be?
Agree. Let us pursue Wisdom. Only problem is. It is a Characteristic of God. Solomon got it as a Gift.
not measuring in the northeast....
When did I call half the country idiots? Conservatives and liberals have a vastly different value system. That doesn't make either side idiots. Much of the difference between conservatives and liberals is moral values. Moral values cannot be proven they can only be supported.
Blah blah blah, you still haven't the balls to address the main reasons why its a fail, and will always be a fail. The process is void, the mechanism too shallow.
You get the behavior that you accept.
lmao no i am legit excited for the anesthesia. it?s the best sleep you?ll ever get.
I know, right?
You're the one rejecting science. And Cheetahs did go through a bottleneck, pretty much all of the experts in the field (note: you aren't an expert, you aren't even a layman) agree with this.
Plotinus lives! Excellent. Actually, Bohm's Implicit Order is a very similar idea.
Any scientifically recognized species which FITS PERFECTLY in between two other scientifically recognized species IS a ''missing link'', poor ignoramus !
Child, I offered such an argument when this OP was first posted. I only came back to read more. Peterson's ramblings about witches seemed a good hypothetical example of bad argumentation for anything unseen/unknowable, so I added that one.
Which goes to show you can prove anything to a halfwit.
They ended up in a recession after taking Crimea. The sanctions should be toughened until they give Crimea back and the part of Ukraine they took back.
Nice to see Christianity is still living, rent free, in Victor's head...
The general moral principle can be, just not the specifics. For example, every major religion I?m aware of has teachings against things like murder, theft, lying, etc. Now they may differ in some ways on what constitutes murder, theft, etc. but the general principle is objective while the application is subjective. I would say this is true for all humanity. We have a general idea of morality that seems to be objective but we have different applications of this morality based on various influences and experiences in our lives and cultures. This is evident by the fact that we generally consider people who do not follow the basic human morality that everyone seems to have as suffering from some type of psychopathy. If someone does not have a moral understanding that it is wrong to kill, lie, steal, etc. we think their brain is not functioning correctly. If these morals are totally subjective then why would the lack of empathetic or moral understanding of these principles constitute a psychiatric disorder rather than just a subjective opinion?
WTF is that suppose to mean? I know people with twigs and berries and XX chromosomes are male, regardless of what they feel.
There is nothing extreme or radical for a devout Muslim in following Koran and Muhammad's example. Would you say that [email protected]
is OK, the only problem are people who follow it?
Why does he disagree with it?
We went to Rocky Top in NC on Sundays as they couldn't sell alcohol in VA on Sunday. LOL I'd like to do a trip to KY. Want to go to Mammoth Caves!
Is that so? Perhaps you might acquaint yourself with Luther's treatise, "On the Jews and Their Lies", wherein he argued that In the treatise, he argues that Jewish synagogues and schools be set on fire, their prayer books destroyed, rabbis forbidden to preach, homes burned, and property and money confiscated. They should be shown no mercy or kindness, afforded no legal protection, and "these poisonous envenomed worms" should be drafted into forced labor or expelled for all time. He also seems to advocate their murder, writing "[W]e are at fault in not slaying them".
I fail to see the connection between the personal freedom to wear one's hair as he pleases and success in life. I'll also point out that unsuccessful people with "strange hair" are significantly outnumbered by unsuccessful people with "normal hair".
Gillette's position seems to stem from her understanding that environmental factors and pressures might persuade the kids to be uhm, open to suggestions lets say.
It looks like it's going to be the couch.