Yup. A real tax cut for the middle class. But that first $80K of everybody's income goes directly back into the GDP - food, rent, mortgage, car payments, cell phones, utilities, entertainment, etc. The more the middle class has, the more they spend, and the more they spend, the more the investment class profits - so that's where we should get the tax revenue. And if it's a flat rate for all income levels, all types of income (wealth really because I'm talking about long term capital gains and dividends as well) and all types of entities (individuals, married couples, corporations, LLCs, non-profits, churches - you name it) that rate does not have to be all that high, projections are incredibly simple, and there's no need for CPAs, tax attorneys or 80% of the IRS.
Maybe. I have no clue. I've been out for 12 years now. I took civics around '05. 27th amendment was ratified in 92. It wasn't in our book...
You must really be pleasant then. ;)
Eugenics is what you are promoting plain and simple. Same thing that Hitler and other Fascists promoted.
I do not care what it sounds like to you. You are not that important.
Please don't be disingenuous. If you know the Tanakh, you're aware of all these things. I could cut & paste right here & now many of the passages demanding genocides (esp the Canaanites atrocities commanded by God), the rapes & pillages, the slaughter of all women (including pregnant ones)/ men/ children/ beasts in these raids. Now I'm being redundant, of course.
Evolution has thus reached only up to the explanation of the phenomenon, why or what causes it, all on the basis of a beginning [of life] where there is no available data for verification. The only evidence that would prove it into reality is a transitional fossil record, for which there is none. Evidences presented so far are observable mutations of species that is subjectively interpreted. And for as long as these remain debatable evidences, it is no evidence at all on evolution. On this basis, there is none that is phenomenally observable about it, except its acceptance by some in believing its reality.
Argument from popularity? Not a good demonstration of truth.
Its based off a book of the same name. Germans win WWII
People do find things that match with the bible. Stuff like the remains of ancient cities. What they do not find is evidence of people coming back from the dead or that the Christian god is even real at all.
perhaps you aren't following the god of your choice then, Sir.
They sure were but we didn't realize how good back then. I remember a big bag of bar BQ chips was 25 cents and a bottle about the same. So many things are gone but not forgotten.
Evo is getting an engine overhaul really...or complete swap. Bacteria consciously transferring sequence across when needed. That explains new splits to new structure to the Cambrian. But...it requires you to believe bacteria are calling the shots too. Intelligence on a tiny scale...like midichlorians from star wars :)
He didn't actually say that. He said you are not defiled be eating with unwashed hands. There's a significant difference between "not washing your hands and eating doesn't make you ritually unclean and impure" and "don't wash your hands"
Obama signed the Fair Sentencing Act.
Wasn?t Greek the same language we just got Ecclesia from?
Thank you. Glad to hear that.
Sorry to keep you waiting....
Not all animals and plants fossilize. Carrier Pigeons don't and so we have no trace of them in the fossil record. Even so we have more than enough fossils to work with. There's no such thing as a missing link. The change from predecessor species to more modern ones is so gradual it is almost imperceptible. This no transitional fossils nonsense is one of the most tiresome and dishonest creationist arguments against evolution. We studied the evolution of the modern horse in college. This is a good way to look at gradual evolution of a species because the fossil record of horses is exceptionally well represented with thousands of finds. We have the ancestor of the modern horse and a transitional species that has characteristics of both the horse's ancestor and modern horses, fossils in the geological column right where they should be. These fossils in the video show changes not between species which is what we studied in school but larger groups in the classification system. But it's really all the same. I certainly know more about this than some Bible thumper who gets their misinformation from other lying and quote-mining creationists at the (Non)Discovery Institute and Creation Ministries. Put down the comic book pick up a science book and join the rest of us in the real world your cult leaders brainwashed you into hating.
You are smart...
Why do you say that? Brown's program was not that Liberal. She is on record as fully supporting it, along with Christine Elliott.
That's my thing. I can see and understand what's going on in front of me, but at the same time, I don't always, simply because I don't know when it's happening all the time.
Your motives are clear.
Lewis, KS, town of my father's birth, has its charm. But no bar or restaurant...
I turned them all off in September, 2016.
Or a couple other, you know, "places" that aren't front. Or center.
I'm not sure there is such a thing as "objective morality".
Sir T, yet we must be honest about how some of the *loudest* and most *political* evangelical fundamentalists ARE creating Real Harm -- or working to do so -- in the lives of those who disagree with them.
I saw a theramin on Craigslist this weekend. The ad said "like new - never been touched."
You are certainly welcome to the last word, if it makes you feel better about your dismal situation.
All radiometric dating, including c14 is expressed with a margin of error. I wonder if TFCC can explain what this means regarding his OP.
Moving on then. If you see marriage as a way to protect a relationship, then any two consenting adults should be permitted to marry. Why would it not be a right?