So if we're going to talk about sentencing at a trial, shouldn't it be psychologists, and parole officers who consult, not victims who talk about how awful what was done to them was?
You, of course, are depending upon your own fallible human reasoning to deny God. That, my friend, is absurd.
Thank you for sharing:)
Popcorn. "You are not worth what I paid you"... From a former boss after I saved his butt...
Seems like the logical next step. So we have Muslims, gays, illegal immigrants, legal immigrants......... what's next?
Yes, I fully understand your claim.
"Krishna said people in his village called him mad and suggested he visit a psychologist."
no way...the world needs more dumpster fire threads bc we're bored and we demand blood!
I did. That was a sentence.
I didn't accept it because...You're wrong.
Have you seen me preaching my religion? Do you even know what my religion is? Who exactly are you talking about? All I see on here is the rabid Atheists espousing their hatred day in and day out on here.
Israel and Jews are not the same thing.
Me too! High five!
The question in a nutshell is "Given all the evidence that nature is the result of a blind natural process rather than deliberate, forward-looking design why attribute that to the direct handiwork of an intelligent designer?".
He'll just spit in his fist and call it a day.
Not offensive that I can see. It does leave room to both be mocked and be celebrated
"The Church destroyed so much knowledge during the Medieval Dark Ages. ..." Your statements are ideological ones, and not empirical. Your facts are simply wrong, and filled with distorted exaggerations based on half-truths. I have informed you that your are not functionally literate in the Social Sciences, and you continue to demonstrate gross errors without accurate empirical references.
Don't really need to, I can simply look at their track record, as for the NDP, not a chance in hell regardless, we can't afford them at all.
And Harley Davidson is moving out of the USA. Trump gets an F-.
Without totalitarianism (which isnt a desirable outcome) conformity - especially concerning a measure of ecology that has a direct impact financially on people, businesses, and governments.... is the only real and tenable solution. Expending the remaining petro resources, moving north, and living underground remain viable options. ;)
You: "If I am elected, we will go to war with Iran" - HRC
No. Common misconception. Not a component of the law.
Goodbye? Really?? Hooray!! Another Gidphating liberal bites the dust!
How about righteous anger? Getting angry at the horrible things that are happening these days, and letting that anger drive you in a way, to change them.
I don?t see where you mention the incubation period, the nuclear regulatory commission stipulates these protocols, it?s not negotiable and shouldn?t be overlooked based on the long term consequences in relation to engineering discrepancies that can compromise the structural integrity of the facility. The other major problem with nuclear energy is the nuclear waste. We?re over 75 years into the nuclear age and we still haven?t figured out what to do with the waste. The Yucca mountain facility is clearly a failure based on the numerous reports of leaks and contamination. Also, the Fukushima nuclear disaster doesn?t instill confidence within the public about the ramifications of nuclear meltdowns, Japan is still cleaning up the mess and they?re running out of places to store the radioactive water used to cool the reactor. Whether it?s earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, tornadoes and or typhoons, natural disasters are a reality regardless of where these facilities are placed. There are no safeguards to natural disasters, therefore nuclear energy is a dead energy technology until we can modify the process to avoid nuclear meltdowns, one way is the MSR concept but I can?t even confirm that until all the variables are calculated. So based on the time frame in reference to zero energy production during its construction process, nuclear energy wouldn?t work regardless along with our inability to get rid of the waste or even store it.
They're saying she didn't die from the radium, even though they handled it by the cartload! One thing says it was from the xrays in ww1, she didn't use protection in the ambulances and someone just said she carried plutonium in vials in her pockets often...awful how they played with that stuff!
Everything that is not proven true is a lie?