Yeah, I know it uses big words longer than a syllable and that's just too hard for you to understand. You should have paid more attention in English class. Your loss.
Anytime you consistently use chemicals in your body its harmful. A lot of the girls that get them are girls that got drunk at the bar and screwed around. Or a career woman who has no time for raising kids.
GOOD! Now how many times does it need to be counted?
Obama set Trump ( Us ) up well with a strong, forward moving economy and Donny fortified it with deregulations and taxes thanks to Eddy Munster. Those will probably both f#ck us down the line, but for now it looks like winning to the novice voter. As long as Trump doesn't do something INCREDIBLY stupid and the economy keeps humming away....... We could see a lot of R wins. The Dems don't have a strong message, they like most are just caught sucked into the disgusting Trump vortex.
Party foul. No one held their beer. Stupid counter!
Or maybe it's just because she doesn't have nice things to say about his BFF Putin.
I defend religious liberty.
I usually just say that I will use the same evidence that they use to justify their disbelief in Thor. . .only change the name of the deity. It seems to work.
Sadly true enough. Looking at it from the dispassionate ?National Geographic,? viewpoint; in terms of natural predators of humanity there?s only pathogens and ourselves.
"Why Compare the Most Fundamentalist Christian with the Liberals or Moderates of Other Religions and/or Atheism?"
that's true. it's also important to note that non-profits and religious organizations and charities, etc. are all different and have different rules and requirements under the 501c umbrella.
What about Matt? Does he get no love?!
Has that ever happened?
Anecdotal evidence, only.
The "process and findings of scientific methods " renders information. You are saying that that information is true? I can agree with that. Experiments and studies that have shown the get the same results over and over, the information can be considered "true".
"You believe I approached the issue incorrectly?"
Get a life.
So say they do "ban" all firearms, or even certain types. In order to get them from well over 100,000,000 weapons owners, they would have to kick down EVERY door in America, tear apart ALL the walls in every building, tear up all the flooring in every building, tear all the attics out, and then dig up every square inch of soil in the United States of America, which is about 2.3 BILLION ACRES of land. That's assuming you can get that far, after you've killed all the gun owners.
There's no might about it - if he hasn't already done so, he will.