Sure...my point is that while it may be against BART rules, it's likely not against the actual "law". Basically, I am mocking the moron threatening to call the cops over a dude eating a burrito.
Did the sun ever revolve around the earth? If it didn't, as we all well now know, it WAS a misinterpretation of an observation, and never a "fact".
The single most shocking revelation in this article is that these trolls heavily targeted Breitbart because Breitbart's commenters weren't right
I can't be bothered to argue about it.
A child cant give consent.
I don't know what wizards really are.
Bob, I'm just shy of 60. When I was a teenager we made up little names to call people but I grew up and put away childish things.
For, dog's sake forget the Ferrari, use an Aston Martin instead.
I see - you're the more smarterer christian, and not an atheist?
Your last comment was deflecting away from your claim .
"The One I am speaking about is a Father. A Father is "intense" involved with "humans"."
Nope, most atheists are very socially moral people which are reflected in our laws. My point is religion for the most part is a horrible place to base your morals from.
Hiding in their homemade bomb shelters with their freeze-dried meals and recycled piss water.
Let's try simple English.
So, just pointing out in many assault cases there is little to no physical evidence. A ten year sentence for pressing charges with little evidence would guarantee less people coming forward.
I hope my atheism never brings me to place where my desire to help my fellow creatures less fortunate is viewed as immoral. I think this stems from one god, personal god, you alone are responsible for salvation, it's narcissistic by nature. I am more interested in ammancipating the victims of human rights abuses among us even if it causes me some personal discomfort.
It's unfortunate really, just yesterday a poster here implied you all had an 'echo chamber' of sorts going, rife with bias in your views, and I thought i was reasonable when I suggested most the other people who post here were also reasonable people with various viewpoints.
You'll not get much argument from me on this one, but you probably will from atheists, since murder is not really part of the atheist "thing" (simple denial of deities).
I have done that. Meanwhile, calling out someone for being what they admit to should stand.
GDP was 2.3% in 2017. Are you looking at quarterly GDP? Because GDP was over 3% many times during Obama's years if you're looking at quarterly GDP. It was as high as 5.2% in q3 of 2014.
Is that your favorite?
Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.
She has to lie because she wants to follow her own heart and not submit to Christ.
Oh it happened......many wonderful days of it.
No child should fear their parent. That they love them in spite of fear is not healthy mentally, and indeed many people end up hating their parents. If you think that has nothing to do with fear, then I pity your children.
Depends where you are. $400 <8 weeks for my pro--choice state is about right. 15 weeks in Mississippi might run you a G.
the coke diet works wonders :)
As murder is a subset of killing, your comment on lions is inapt and inept.
You're in for rude awakening you weak minded fuck. But you won't do shit.
Yeah, okay, we all know that you are so much wiser and so much more intelligent than God......so you would be a great candidate to buy that bridge for sale in Brooklyn. Of course, we don't really care that it doesn't make sense to you, for you are just another sinful, fallible man, and do not think like God thinks. It only has to make sense to Him. Yours is not to question His judgments; rather it is yours to accept and to worship Him, knowing that He is God, and He is wiser and stronger than we humans are. [Isaiah 55.]
1. You are still generalizing. Guess you can't help yourself.
Bad laws are being taken down. However, these laws aren't bad.
The church, especially the Christian faith is charitable, when they have the money to do so, otherwise, they only pay themselves first, selfishly.
For you, yes. For her, no.
I never said I had ?values?, I said, ?valuables?.