Oh.... I got banned from The Blaze too .
The PROMISE program started in Illinois and helps to create criminals like Nikolas Cruz. I made my case.
It's happening everywhere, even in prosperous communities. I see it daily around here.
To educate yourself in the real History of the Church, its Politics, and Orders; something they do not teach in schools.
Second USSC Justice who will uphold our laws and not make them up as they go.
A very few.
My own apparent invention of God?
NT for sure is something like night and day compared to OT and JC was good man. Problem is "boss" is the very same murderous sadistic monster from OT. History could be very different if JC started new religion, not being burdened by old one.
I find his statement disturbing and suspicious.
Could've had 1 game if J.R. wasn't a dumb*ss.
You don't obey the rules here, dear...
And the innocent child killing deity that told the Israelites to slaughter their neighbors was morphed into a peaceful loving god.
Definitely! But I do not like half-assing in any circumstance, be it child or spouse. I dont half-ass take care of any them, so i expect that the love should be you extending your best effort to me..just like I do for you. I fixed my ex a drink once, using a glass he "washed". He was upset that when he looked into it, it was dirty. "You fixed my drink in a filthy glass?!" No dear, I chose the same glass that you expected us to use??. For the record, I wasn't going to let him drink it, but it illustrated my point far better than anything I could have said, trying to compromise.
Is there a link between shootings and atheism? No. Just like there's no link between shootings and people that eat vegetables. Look in the prison system and you'll find plenty of killers that are of the Christian faith.
Shorts are comfy, especially in the summertime.
So the baker has the right but the bakery hasn?t.
Sun standing still for the battles, Noah's flood, the zombie uprising with Jesus.
You blame me?
Maybe after you're done smearing autistic people you can explain how it is that your personal, private definitions of "deism" and "omnipotence" and "empirical knowledge" should be the operating definitions in our "conversation". Because if you don't, you're simply arguing that your emotional attachment to the way you use words is extraordinarily important to you. Which is interesting, from a psychological perspective about why humans hold irrational beliefs, but it doesn't tell me much else about whether there is evidence for God. And as has been said before, the fallacy of equivocation is one children literally use in kindergarten, and has no place in serious conversations.