So imagining there was a God outside ?space and time? which means outside gravity and matter.... and god being an immortal being, I really don?t understand how he would be human in appearance. Why have legs if there is no ground to walk on, why have hands if everything moves at your desire, why have a mouth or eyes if there is no need to eat and you can see all things at once...
You get upset science busts the myths in the bible so need to attack it. we all saw what you were trying to do here.
What, are you saying that the degrees in Cracker Jack boxes aren't good? Oh crap, don't tell my employer! :)
And she's not teaching her children a very good example.
Also not true. God encourages us to ask questions and accepts our doubt. It is when you ask questions and wait for God, not Satan, to answer, that Satan's lies grow root in your mind until you are no longer able to discern truth from fiction.
You find functional literacy in comic books. Enough said.
don't know, but i'm checking out Cook and Crone's work now. seems interesting. it sounds like they have reconsidered some of the more speculative claims in their book, Hagarism, but the basic thesis sounds like a reasonable approach to the foundations of islam.
Popcorn...and minimum wage
"I'll bet anything that they would say you are wrong based on their interpretation of the Bible."
It may be your OP, but I was invited to share what I think. And I stand by my statement. Your arguments are not intended to talk about science nor to clarify the fact of evolution via a scientific alternative, no. Your arguments are pointing at selling your brand of religion, period.
Even when adjusted for percentages, of the America population, you will find that there are far more christians in jail than Atheists.
Depends on her competition but if it came down to hillary vs Rice or Harris vs Rice i'd choose rice. Get biden in and he'd get my vote.
Socialized medicine does not work here and the majority of the citizens here have already made it very clear that we do not want it. The elderly and the young children who are the most vulnerable are already covered. The disabled are covered, our vets are covered. We simply do not want that here.
What's fortunate about it?
Nothing you've said addresses the Fake News cover.
You link to the Lubin 2017 study. Perhaps you would enjoy hearing Dan Lubin discuss it. (The video isn't very well edited, but I linked to the most relevant part for our purpose.)
Its not old news apparently since it was recently invoked and one of the reasons this case went for the baker. If you learned nothing at all from this, learn that tolerance is not an LGBT only right.
And vice versa.