Granted - over the top and I apologize. However, the disparity between the races is pronounced and so dramatic that in some instances it is only DNA similarity that maintains any semblance of common ground. When white Europeans landed on the on the shores of sub-Saharan Africa they found tribes of people, who despite thousands of miles of temperate coastline, had never built any kind of boat beyond primitive dugouts for fishing. No evidence of exploration had been achieved by any tribe of note. Neither was there any evidence that they ever constructed anything beyond a grass hut - a two story structure was never found. Only the Dogon of Mali appear to have achieved any level of advancement and theirs bore a tight resemblance to the language and culture of ancient Egypt.
Hate in general is pretty much everywhere.
I did. Haven't made a habit of it though.
You're a mod?
I've heard the difference between Conservatives and Liberals is "do you believe humans are fundamentally good?"
As to the fate of TA: not your problem -- you just provided a lifeboat. As things stand, the only way any comments area is going to be worthwhile for serious people is to have it moderated. The TIMES understands that, which is why their comments sections -- which they provide on only some of their articles -- involve moderation by some 14 paid staffers on the "Community Desk," TA obviously couldn't undertake anything of that magnitude, and the entirely predictable duly transpired. Indeed, this is only site I know of on anything like this scale that operates with unpaid mods -- and I have no idea how you folks do it.
So sad. Christ died to redeem us (all of us) and you think we still need fraudsters?
That is what sets Christianity apart.
LOL yes 7 years I think that is the biggest sticking point for a lot of people is the time period
Oh, now, Verisimi.
Squared away is military language. Control.
On second thought, dammit,
When I can get pregnant I'll feel more invested in this discussion.
"the asymmetric extremism of the Republican Party."
How hot do you have your orange juice? O_o
No, you don't have the right to try and discriminate against gays.
They already told him they wanted a custom designed cake for a same sex wedding. If he didn't want to serve them because they were gay, why did he offer to sell them other items? That's the question you have not answered and will never answer for obvious reasons.
of course, I saved it!! (the bacon, not her hand)
Since I've been heavy into genealogy for many years, it's easier to grasp the concept. Tracing a line from today backwards, one would think "okay, everybody has a mom". But tracing a line from say 8-10 generations ago to today, it becomes obvious how it happens. Many women never married, or only had sons, or had daughters who never married, or only had sons, or no children at all. Every line I've traced has broken lines on either the male side or the female side. Some lines virtually disappear. Example: My Grandmother was a McConnell. Traced this line back to GGG-Grandparents. Traced the line back down each of the descendants. Today, there are no members of this line named McConnell (although there are many who descend from the GGG-Grandparents).
I will give you a bonus if you stop using sarc tags.
No. Back to school for you.
it makes me passionate about womens choice/healthcare, birth control, and sex ed:) I wish I had known then what I know now.
He's only a troll according to the left.
I can assure you, the Jewish people look at the OT that is much different than Christianity. Muslims view Jesus differently.
And that's why in each case, it's for a court of law to determine.
It's a solid concept and the first actually implies it. It would mean religions can speak to a government regardless of being considered a social club or political party (which is all they truly are). But it seems the most zealous of religious people don't get it. So blatant language is needed. Same as an equality in sex amendment so the ADF can become a criminal organization by constitutional decree.
Excuse me, pardon
1. Teachers shouldn't ridicule religion, although they should be allowed to present
You mean you know NOW this wasn't racism here. Racism is a problem in other cases. Save that argument for those other cases next time.