As I've said, I simply can't take any such claims seriously when on-demand sources such as TV, films, gaming, and Internet contain either porn or scantily clad, provocative women and men on a 24/7 basis.
The NRA has released a statement that if only the sofa (BALKARP Sleeper sofa, Knisa, black) had been properly armed with an assault weapon it could have dropped the perp before he got a shot off.
I will be all over it if she let's me
I am a liberal, she isn't. She clearly wants an authoritarian government to implement such stupid regulations. She should go live in Saudi Arabia for a few years because for a professor of women's studies, she clearly is blind to the stunning progress that Western society has made in this regard.
Meteorologists around the world:
1) I think that people do not see that prayer is useless, because it is not useless to them.
We?re the perpetrators confirmed to be Christians?
So you admit that you can't describe the role emotions and "value experiences" play in empirical science.
I was talking about Catholic influence. My personal thoughts are in the area of the damage that it has caused.
Is that supposed to be an argument?
Do you say he doesn't exist because of the implications that would have on your worldview? Because there are a myriad of historical documents outside the Bible and "Christian forgeries", as you so call them. There are Roman historical texts which reference him, there are Jewish records that reference him. And did I really read "No accounts of any disciples being martyred for their faith"? I'd recommend picking up a history book or two, unless of course, you believe that every historian who ever wrote about the existence of a man named Jesus was part of some grand conspiracy. In which case you can pick and choose as much as you'd like.
the fact that you can neither prove or disprove gods existence, at least currently, doesn't mean that there isn't a simple answer to that question. there was a time when we couldn't validate germ theory, but if we simply said "we cant prove or disprove The four humors of Hippocratic medicine, deal with it." we would be a lot dumber... and sicker today. if you don't like the discussion, you are certainly free to refrain from clicking it.
The left doesn't listen to "reason". So now what? LOL!
"Then you cite again... opinions"
If the parks are separated, it?s for a reason. Can?t follow the rules, stay home
I don't think it is that simple, if this is the standard you wish to use then you have to fold in a balance of interests. If causing you minor or trivial harm will gain a higher good then doing so appears justifiable. If I am driving down the road and a child darts in front of my car I can choose to swerve into your yard, damaging your mailbox and some landscaping but save the child from injury. You are harmed, but I will suggest in the face of your complaint that my actions were necessary due to the acts of an innocent third party.
Don't spoil a good argument with logic...
Whatever excuse you need to run.
That specific person represents an idea, a nation and entire ideologies and groups. So you can choose to trivialize and act like that's all it is about but that would just expose your willing ignorance.
and there are some very reasonable people on here. Obviously, none of us think we will convince the other but just maybe, we can help some of those who are questioning?
Of course, the decision only sided with the baker in that he got an unfair hearing. SCOTUS did not side even opine on the actual issue of the cake, so let's not frame this as some sort of victory that it's not.
Journalism has been dead for quite some time. Leftist propaganda has taken it's place. KAG!
The latter is something to truly get PI$$ED about.
With me it was more of "you're wasting your education and career to stay home indefinitely?!" But if it works for you and your family what's the big deal.
But there is a lot of Theology left from it .?? ??
By that time they should be hooked up with a doctor or other professional that can sign for Medical benefits for them. Still more than welfare
I think that unfortunately the terms "pro-lfe" and "pro-choice" have become so binary that they mask any nuance there may be. Pro-life typically means against all abortion (but oddly enough usually supporting the death penalty). Pro-choice typically means abortion with as few restrictions, if any, as possible. But there are a great many people in the middle of those streams.
Buh bye you such a loving Christian lmfao.