2) i dislike celebrity scandal articles. i don't feel like it is realistic to try to relate to our love lives. to me they exist in a different ecosystem. (not sure how to word this better)
then you are an atheist
Evolution provides many carnivores with traits that allow for better hunting. Cold doesn't have anything to do with the color of polar bears' fur.
Well it is a well documented statistic and historical fact. I just assumed that it was understood and universal knowledge.
That?s something that the regular school kids could use a lot of.
AMERICA?S GOVERNMENT IS MORE ACCOUNTABLE: Since taking office, President Trump has worked to ensure government is more accountable to the American people.
Then why is all of the whining coming from the right?
Can't think of the last mass shooter or domestic terrorist that wore a burqa at the time. Oklahoma City: Ryder truck. Boston marathon: backpacks. Las Vegas: luggage. Come to think of it, most of them have been men.
I guess it annoys you that I'm criticizing Islam.
Neither are relevant enough to even view anymore.
but where did this force of gravity came from , from another Big Bang again ?..lol
haha Your beliefs far outweigh your understanding of the sciences, but you go ahead and choose the opinions of superstitious, uneducated, and primitive writers of parables over people educated in genetics, observation, and years of focused study. And then you ask "Why not consider...Goddidit once more?"
I often find myself arguing about sexuality and how it doesn't have to define the person. Also those people that refuse to respect other's sexuality or identity. For example, if someone is born a women but identified as a man, and makes the body changes to adjust to HIS feelings, people would call that person by their born name or refer as a women just because they don't believe in the same.
What do you mean when you say "never contain dialogue?"
It's not really an opinion; it's basic logic. Nowhere does the Bible say "Follow these parts, ignore these parts, teach 50% of this part, and this part is optional." The Bible is not a diverse collection of disparate stories; it's a tightly written, highly cohesive narrative from beginning ("Genesis") to end "Revelation.") One cannot pick and choose what parts to believe, or in terms of the New Testament, which of Jesus's words to obey, and still consider one's self a true Christian. Sure, there are many groups that consider themselves under the rubric of Christianity, but that's besides the point.
I suspect OP is correct that Salm has no claim to expertise. Secular fundies picking apart the Bible without much understanding of it usually aren't much different than religious fundies picking apart evolution without much understanding of it. Both are typically intellectually lazy dilettantes who believe they're qualified to challenge experts using their invincible confirmation bias powers. And they're both more interested in antagonizing each other than in discovering historical truth.
Except that he admits he stares at other women despite his partner getting upset about it. BTW not sure if they are married yet.
Alright, your consistent reliance on vapid posts is noted. Another and you are blocked.
Pretty big check against karma he just wrote.
The part where you deny a key characteristic of the thing you claim is undeniable. Bear with me here, I just want to be sure we understand each other.
Then explain what you meant so I can understand . ?? ??
Which is why I challenged you to find it.
Red velvet please :)