Huge dildo insertions porn tubes

And NASA trusts his credibility as to radiometric dating just as you do--not that NASA ever asked for them!! You're not fooling anyone..

?Did I say blacks? I think I said non whites.....?

It is the same. Exactly the same process. Small changes that, when added together, make two different organisms look radically different.

Heyo, this is a great point, and I think one that only happens because we take for granted Christian theism as the viable option against atheism (as opposed to something like Deism). Let me explain what I mean.

This isn't some obscure knowledge but the crux of Christianity. Christ set us (humanity) free from 'trying to get to God'. Its fundamental. Religion is..mankind trying to get to God, but the doctrine of Christ is..God getting to mankind. Polar there.

Ah yes, the ancient book that makes claims, pretending that the writers knew people's minds than we know our own.

You are busy saying what you want to hear and making the arguments you want to make.

Longest? That apply to the United States?

That is why I blocked this dufus long ago.

A whole year of vacation? Damn, I need to renegotiate my benefits package.

Homosexual advocates want to, without proof, declaim that homosexuality has biological roots, they are ?born that way.? They want to convince people that if people are born homosexual in the same way that they are born black, then any moral objections to homosexuality are the equivalent of racial prejudice! But there is an unstated ethical proposition that congenital features are by definition immune to moral judgment. Well, homosexuality may have a strong biological basis, but so does pedophilia, rape and violent crime. There is as much, if not more, evidence that alcoholics are ?born this way,? than homosexuals. Answering the question of whether a particular inclination is inborn or acquired is not the same as answering the question of whether it is good or bad: Nobody is going to sing songs about how racists, rapists and alcoholics are ?born this way,? nor should they. When the moral case is INCONVENIENT to make, the easiest thing to do is to pretend that it is not there, and defer to ?science.?

Does seeing something as illogical make it so? That can?t possibly be the case, because people on both sides of the fence see their position as logical and people who think differently as illogical.

Hmmm, that is what I call "in-congruent thinking. "

There is a simple and basic reality:

You better tell Trump. It's his main pattern.