But he's the god-father of anti-semitism. Can you name a more successful Anti-Semite? Are you saying he didn't understand the vitriol he was spewing?
I agree 100%. But if the doctrine calls for it, its to blame. I get atheism has very little.
Then it must be the pianist.
But it can be objective too Sue. The twelve (and more) were exposed to things which were meant to prove its God. Right? The bible is meant to be indirect evidence because its a relationship you test over time. It is directly tested though by the works. We have prophecy to test. It literally says...believe by the word or by the works, just believe already, mix in that and not the unbelief evidence.
" Religious followers choose to do it, so it's fine."
More often than not, it's projection rather than deflection.
Oh, I'm wincing thinking about that...
They are still upset over mixed rave marrages being made le gal the same way
Ford nation is a concept in a tiny few minds. Mostly wannabes who think that a millionaire gives a damn about them.
In the vedic tradition a qualified teacher is necessary to interpret scripture otherwise the reader will interpret it according to his or her ignorance and preferences. The scripture is not considered the source of the knowledge, only the official record. The source is consciousness itself.
I get up at the same time every morning
And Tory himself, more qualified to be mayor over premier. Neat.
Try slipping it into a porn movie.
This is an interesting find......
While all the atheist whine while pushing for legal enforcement of their religion
Not just with body type, or whatever, but I think for the most part, you should just keep your negataive opinions about others to yourself. Sometimes you can't help thinking them, but that doesn't mean you need to share.
Mentally unstable people, like yourself, should have no access to BB guns, much less actual weapons.
So than you have bad reading comprehension. Because if you sid you would have know what creator je was talking about. You poor thing.
Not talking about law, though. Just the fact that pro choice is about not forcing your own opinion on someone.
Lol. So I been told. I guess it's like a he new myspace of hook ups. Glad I'm far past all that stuff.
This line of concern could be directed at many religions, not just Christianity.
Given that formal marriage is at its core all about money or political alliances, and that the bride is not legally considered the property of her husband, why bother legally marrying at all? Maybe the average couple could have informal weddings (not legally binding) the way poorer people in medieval days did. They would have a huge, rambunctious party, say the vows, and when something happened, or the marriage otherwise went south, they could simply part ways and that would be that. Both husband and wife would be free to have another private wedding each if they wished. This practice was especially popular among Welsh coal miners in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
True dat! hehe
Thanks but I'm not a loser. Don't need a safe space.
it's possible that I couldn't agree more. it's ok though, I'm quite sure we disagree about other wrong turns.