Nope. God of any variety has not spoken to me yet. But I am not going to waste time sitting around waiting.
the EU needs a proper independent investigation into the allegations
My asking about Trump was mild, his response was Vulgar. He has taken no responsibility for his? Ooooooops sorry this is out of sequence been blocked. ?? ??
My eyesight is not so good anymore. The floors may look fine to me until I put on reading glasses or walk barefoot and stumble over a dustbunny.
Find friends that aren't rude. Why do you even call rude people "friends"?
In this thread, I've seen several people trying to say that according to the Bible, Jesus was not actually God. Thought I'd offer these verses to help clarify things:
You could do better on the humor side of things. That was dry and expected.
Yes they do. They've been debating every fundamental teaching since it was first scrawled across papyrus. There were entire sects that didn't even believe in a celestial jesus. Heck its argued that even Paul didn't believe such. So no. You couldn't be more wrong.
Yes, don't we miss her. But we can carry on her work.
Thanks for reiterating my point.
lol yeah, I am sure that you just tried to tell me that by the time I see a gun pointed at me I'm fucked, and no gun would help me... which means, in your opinion, no one in history ever defended themselves with a gun against an armed assailant and lived. They were 'fucked' remember? Too late for them XD You fucking clown.
"When they checked his Passport it did not contain any "stamp" from Czeckoslovakia"
LOL nope -- it was all those violent video games.
"Nothing" is not "no thing" in physics; it IS something. Like "particle" it is taken as having a different meaning than in a non-scientific world.
I'm torn as I prefer to believe in the pre-Civil War version of America where states had rights... but Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence." actually probably applies here.
I'm not sure he was a textbook atheist, but he certainly wasn't a Christian. That's ridiculous. He may have occasionally used Christian allegory in his speeches, but that was purposeful and with an intent to propagandize. There are numerous quotes from Hitler where he openly mocks and disparages Christianity and considered it an impediment to the creation of his super, humanistic state. He did not believe in the Christian God of the Bible. If anything supernatural, he tended towards paganism and Norse mythology, which makes him an atheistic-pagan. Labeling Hitler as a Christian when he never lived according to Christian principles is counterproductive.
Gotta chime in and say that I support 2nd amendment. Any politician running for office locally advocating round up of firearms would be trounced in election.
Nope. It is just the natural course of humans in their "godly existence".
Your ignorance comes from Islam.
I'm not the one that denies the threat of MS-13.
Lmao, Thank you for "letting me off the hook"
Truth is Truth, and what I state is my truth, and what you say is your truth, neither one has been defined by the Ultimate Source as being, in any way, reliable. However, I've been researching 'God' for over 50 years, and I believe that what I say is, essentially, true, but, perhaps, not the Ultimate Truth.
Maeve is my favorite character on there. She's tough when she needs to be, but she doesn't just go around killing people just because like Deloris.
I don't feel people have to defend their personal experiences. I personally couldn't do it. However my personal opinion shouldn't make anyone insecure about theirs.
I've stated that I've not yet heard a convincing enough argument, don't put words in my mouth. And do you realize what tolerance means? It doesn't mean agreement. If we agreed, there'd be nothing to tolerate. Tolerance is when people disagree, but don't attack the other person for there disagreement.
So, any ideas on zakat? I have suggested to start with defining the doctrine sources on it.
Where do laws come from? Aren't they based on peoples' perceptions of moral behavior? Why is it illegal for you to kill? Because science says so? Who are you to tell other people where they may or may not get their moral understanding from? Aren't you acting a bit totalitarian?