I never said that was my solution. I am asking YOU to stop playing games and just say what it is you think people need to realize, and what your solution is to that issue.
Interesting opinion. Not one I share.
Coyne obscures the discussion with his hostility and put downs. I would agree that your suggestion is posible in principle. As far as I can tell, Coyne is arguing that the particular coupling that happens when genes are transferred is random, and most fail, and just a few succeed -- and we can build an incremental model of how this all happened. I think Shapiro is arguing that the coupled processes acting across both genes and other cellular structures in parallel, suggest either an intentionality, or a collaborative principle behind physics, which lead to much more macro-scale evolutionary options, and the small scale inremetns taht Coyne thinks lead to this transfer process, will not every produce such gene transfers.
dont mind me, just dropping this off
No you have to prove that your morals are right to him or they are just immoral.
Lol, I'm like, do you want me to get your shoes, she just looks at me like I'm crazy.
This is an amazing life both of them are having .
Excellent! You are the first one to notice . Ironically you misspelled my misspelling hahahahaha
Where's the proof that people are not killed by atheists? Who gives for life for a god that does not exist? If Christ is risen, as Christ says, His followers would be killed. This is proven in history. Who would die for a lie? If 2,000 years of science has not produced proof that Christ is not risen, where's the proof for atheism, then? Christ claimed to be God. He proved it by coming back to life. If that's not true, where's the proof?
What is your preferred source for news?