Lol he is the worst. I have never seen a dog so nosy in my entire life.
Well someone gave a thumbs up on the definition... so I looked it up. It turns out Sodomy has included both forms of Fun....oral and anal. So I had just never heard Oral referred to that way.
1/. No. I think those who are religious, and support the idea of flock thinking and are ratger intolerant of individuals that actually practice being themselves rather than pretending to be god blessed by having communions are most like the communists. Submission is freedom, self professed angry, jealous and vengeful Gods are Love and general intolerance is goodwill toward Mankind.
LOL I resemble that remark... OMG. I guess I need more therapy.
I'll tell you what's stupid: belief without evidence.
Ok, cool. Majority opinion indicates that Nazareth was a place in the 1st century. What does that have to do with...well...anything?
It?s probably some info he gleaned from the White House tour.
I love statedclearly so much.
A customized cake for a same sex wedding.
See, that is not a choice, you don't get one. Gay people can lie to themselves and have sex with straight folks, but its a lie and they know it.
"generation" is not referring to mankind."
Low moral values. Lack of honesty. Selfishness. Lack of responsibility. Lack of politeness and manners.
We are due a FULL and COMPLETE audit of Lib mismanagement and corruption over the past 15 years.
Trump , why did he pick an Obama guy
Where are they giving up on natural selection?
Heck the Europeans love plenty of inbreeding. Used to be a sign of nobility.
Ah yes... I believe the cliche response is "fool me once shame on you..."
Which is absent in you.
Do you think he will go to prb? I have some stuff to say to him
Nothing to be ashamed of. The country needs people like you - just not assessing scientific research.
Going to need more information. Heck the website isn't even secure.
Depends on the pizza, but actually agree overall.
The above are a sin and not a sin according to the Bible.
I was thinking more of the second bit. Naming yourself after how much you (allegedly) upset SJWs seems like having an ongoing go at them. You're the one who said that being on the attack all the time indicated insecurity, not me.
It's mainly Christians doin' the masacrees in America.
You headed to back to the joint SG?
I generally as a rule don't block people. Even if I disagree with someone's viewpoint, if they are reasonable, they are usually open to discussion so as to better understand. If they aren't reasonable, it's usually evident by their initial post, in which case I simply skim past it. I don't think I can imagine being so thin-skinned as to require blocking a stranger from saying mean things on the internets.