Like it?s the tip of the iceberg
How about then we get it to as good as I want it, then when we're a fraction of the way to where you want it to go, we'll work on that?
Only if I don't invite my rich relatives who complain about how bloody, stinking rich we all are. I hate that.
I can have any discussion you wish ... but be assured that our on line personalities very much reflect our real selves .. If you think you have a separate persona on line it is almost certainly just a personality or belief system which you prefer to hide or mask in 'real life' ..
Obviously my point was they're both perfectly legitimate under our system.
But you would?ve have two more players on your team.
Sigh...... I asked for it... LOL I thought it was a DC dance step... It was hip hop a second ago...
They can try and they can fail. Those are luxuries we have as a nation. We can argue with our government and thats good. Though, as a side note...Im glad those laws have failed. I dont care what people do about their life just leave mine alone. Its a very simple stance.
Thanks for offering a bit more of a summary of the book than you did in your last post
I mean I think women do as well which is why a lot of people are in bad or at least not great situations. If you want something you have to speak up
Why do you think counting words that describe you is clever?
I suppose I do think that but that God didn't really punish wrongs in the way that normal ethical people would consider wrongs. God is arbitrary and unnecessarily violent towards people who simply displeased Him. If God punished actual wrong doing, that would be better. But He doesn't and never has so that is a bad example. Old testament God punishes those who break His arbitrary laws and New testament God punishes those who don't believe in His preposterous plan. A toss up as to which is worse.
When did I ever say ?Thou shall not pass!? to Dan?s wife? Oh wait I didn?t....Because I didn?t JUDGE her. That?s God?s job to decide if she gets through the gates or not. I?m merely pointing out the sin of heresy. It?s probably not her fault as most Protestants are ignorant of their heretical beliefs. But that doesn?t change the fact that Protestant denominations preach heresies. Dan?s wife is proabably just a product of her culture and believes what she told to believe. I?m just saying Protestant and atheist beliefs are wrong. I?m not judging individual souls. But in the trilemma of our three opposing beliefs, there can only be one version of Truth. And through study and logic one can discover that the correct version of God is told through the Church because Christ said so.
I think we all knew that. It?s just been a tough week for some folks.
I'm from the south and hate grits. Fried okra is the way to go as long as I don't have to wash and cut up the slimy stuff.
Nah I'm good
The people that did not enter into the ARK and eat Revelations to the point of transfiguration will all be crushed by HIS Glory which HE comes with that is 7x brighter than that of the sun. Those that did enter the ARK and ate Revelations to the point of transfiguration will be transfigured by the same Glory that HE comes with. The Sun shall be switched off, and the Light of Eden will light the earth that will also be transfigured by the same Glory.
A lamenting Hilly's admirer?
yur heart is hardened.. and I am not so generous as to give that which is holy to dogs... :) LOL!!!!Matthew 7: 6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
Oh, FFS. There's not a single 'new' idea in the Bible. It's a collection of stories. Paul was a turn of the millennium L Ron Hubbard.
Yes, a most likely mostly fictional character featured in the NT. Read it objectively and you will soon see the fictive construction.
What makes you think that rejection of the Duggars means embrace of Che? I don't want to live in Cuba nor do I want to live in the Republic of Gilead!
Now you are wanting us to believe that you know the meaning of the words Jefferson used, not surprisingly to fit your view. No, what he said was "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State." You can tap dance all you want, but that is very clear. ("You can worship any God you want, but keep religion out of government").
Hedonism and social responsibility are not mutually exclusive. In fact, in the absence of social responsibility, hedonism is too difficult to sustain.
Just out of curiosity, how come your GF was #27 when she was the first in line after the cutoff point?
It's a sea slug
My point only is that Jesus had to have male DNA to be fully human. Whether it was specially provided by God just for that purpose, or whether it was the DNA of a descendant of Adam, is a separate question.