I love the two girls. they thought it was hilarious.
Your example shows that other people can make a sacrifice. It doesn?t show that Jesus didn?t.
Particularly in Rome.
Then there are those so-called freaks that become "reformed" once they do get married.
It should have stayed with the states. The people decided, either by direct plebiscite or via their legislatures. When it was on the ballot in my state, I voted.
Thank Trump for being stupid enough to call it a "Muslim travel ban".
Maybe we should concentrate on our part and do what we can to make this world better than we found it.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
Nice photo...has nothing to do with a president requiring separating babies from desperate mothers over a misdemeanor charge then holding the babies as ransom against the parent?s right to due process.
I forget nothing, I do not align myself w/any group that is disruptive,
God didn't write the bible, and he never dictated it either.
She only calls out the fundamentalist Canadians
It will stand forever!!! :) LOL!!! it was here before you andit will be here long after your are gone!! :) LOL!!! and all your wurds will likewise pass away! :)
Not semantics, specifics.
There being no God as an argument is not really a negative, it would be just Zero.
What I enjoy most about posts like these, is that is reinforces the reliability of science, since it is falsifiable; unlike religion which isn't.
Yeah, the presumption is the worst part. A friend of mine had a boyfriend who "accidentally" put it up her butt because *how was he supposed to know?!*
And against history, your Bible's prophecy fails in every faculty.
The placebo effect proves that what we think, even when untrue, can have real consequences.
You actually support this ?banning? and harassing ?
I do care about dead children. If I can prevent a death I will prevent it. Are you insinuating that the only way to prevent deaths of children is by taking every single gun away from gun owners?
If we don't charge and punish the employer, we are just spinning our wheels.
Didn't say he was blameless he was an adulterer who certainly used his powerful position to get a young woman, let's face it he wouldn't have had a second glance if he were a White house porter now would he and she certainly wouldn't have had an affair with him. But she went into it willingly so was certainly an accomplice not a victim.
Clearly I'm not very good at it. I won't be quitting my day job to become an erotica author.
That is illogical, Anna Nemo. It is a logical fallacy know as "chronological snobbery". Truth is the same always,