it's because you don't understand that Islam is a violent totalitarian ideology.
NO the particles behavior is part of nature, as wacky as they may behave.
You can't order me around, negro perv.
That is a heretic interpretation of the passage I've posted. Are you a philosopher? Sorry but the Bible is not a philosophy book unlike Socrates' or Plato's writings.
Sorry but I find your analogy to be wrong.
You keep talking about the design of the cake. If you don't know what the couple requested, why do you continue to use this defense?
The god of the old testament was wengeanful..JC came to give us hope.
Sorry. Corrected, Are you a Bible scholar or just go by what people tell you or read an atheist website?
The stats on religion and prison inmates are on multiple sites on google. You probably know about many Christian criminals already. Many are in the news and the criminal enterprise known as the Catholic church is famous for it. There is nothing special about religion.. The God you believe in is the biggest criminal having drowned millions and burned to death many others. Your religion is full of criminals. Don't act surprised. And no I am not a liar. I have no reason to be. I am an atheist and ecstatic about it.
Publish and then I'll see.
Sorry. America is the greatest nation on the planet.
As I said before, I don't see myself in that classification.
Conservatives never burned a cross on Obama's White House lawn, and even their relentless efforts to lynch him were largely figurative.
"You are very much saying that everything that has already happened has or had (doesn't make sense either way) a 100% of occurring."
"the people who voted for Ford don't have their hand out"
Change over time, the mechanisms by which it happens... There really isn't an aspect of evolution which is not supported strongly by evidence to the point where it is not considered proven.
Since I didn't make that claim, I'm not required to prove it
I agree actually
It makes for great fodder, so I just post it to expose and make fun of their stupidity. What can I say? I bore easily. ;-)
Happy to wager, all you need is the ability to ante...BUMMER.
And just how do a Hog distinguish the two? Nuff said.
calling you one what?
Yea. ...we're all getting "the deal" here.
Meh. I'm not a drinker, and I very rarely get sick. *shrugs*
Also, it's NOT even a gish gallop, because there's only one argument. I think you're equating 4 separate quotes or wordcount or separator lines or 7 questions to being arguments, but it's just one over-riding argument. That is "are anti-theists reluctant to accept changes to evolutionary theory for fear of creationists scoring points" or however you want to see it. The answer appears to be yes.
The true attack is on sex education / womens healthcare and birth control, christianity has always been of the view point the more women at home breeding more cultists / christians the better which is why the catholic church for example is against even using condoms
Because chance is irrelevant to past events. If you roll a single die and all land on six six times in a row... that doesn't mean the chances are now that you'll roll another six. Its the same odds as before. The difference is now the chance that you landed six sixes in a row was one of one. It has NO baring on future rolls. The odds of the next roll is still one in six that you'll hit six again. There is no chance that your past roll will not have been six sixes in a row. That already occurred. Chances are irrelevant for past events. They occurred. You are, as I pointed out confusing past and present tense and attempting to use it incorrectly. They are not interchangeable in this context but instead are irrelevant to what had occurred.
Don't make us pick on you too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lolololol