He wants all the criminal illegals to be imprisoned with their kids...or any others that bring other peoples kids. A family that goes to prison together, thrives together.
Ummm, much more involved? And the only reason they lost many more people in it was the incompetence of their leaders and Stalin's willingness to throw lives away like they were candy! Not to mention he stupidly believed Hitler and wasn't prepared when Hitler turned on him.
Church Hymns mostly
Which has what to do with jobs and Pelosi?
Not semantics, specifics.
Who says that any of it bothers me? I confront them head on. If not, why would I be here? As for me believing ridiculous things, lets just say I am an adult and I can choose to believe whatever I want.
YOU'RE NOT MY REAL DAD!!!!!!!!!
LOL "they're all weenies but I'm cool guy. Cool guy is me."
When he tells slaves to obey their masters as they should obey him, then that is condoning it.
No such thing as far right in Canada. US Democrats consider us too lefty even for them. Regardless, all I?ve seen from the Liberals and NDP is regression, systematic dismantling of individual rights, either through overreaching into how people raise their kids, live their lives, and overtaxation.
Great to hear.
Lesson learned: Before you even apply logic resort to threats.
Cause they're Big ?
Do you cherry pick all science questions until you find one study that agrees with your faith view?
a dwarf stripper could be fun
Cheese is the same story "We take milk... and we let it go REALLY bad... I'm talking hard and crusty bad... And then we slice it and eat it with toast!"
Yeah, kinda weird..and why me?
You haven't seen a few of the rabid anti-abortionists that I've seen then...
Are you expecting this to somehow validate the bible in any way? Or are you so into science that you get excited when it becomes more accurate by removing the bits that aren't good enough?
It's all we have
Actual Friendship goes both ways. You do favors for your friends, but they're not supposed to take advantage in return.
I'm always open to new evidence and it was in the late 70's
You seem to be using a Q scholar who takes the broadest possible interpretation of Q's contents. Most Q scholars agree that Q contained no birth story, no genealogy, no arrest of Jesus, no trial, no crucifixion, and no resurrection. Some Q scholars believe that Q contained bits of context for some of the quotes. I take a narrower view of that. I think even these bits of context can be sufficiently explained as the gospel writers' creations, and that Papias was referring to Q when he wrote his "Expositions on the Sayings of the Lord."
Descriptive language? You mean where he stated outright that terms like "code" were not synonyms, metaphors, or analogies?
Bomb them too. Fuck em all