You mean there is no evidence that you find acceptable.
Spoilers when I open them, Yvonne. ??
I asked who does, not who doesn't. Thanks for your opinion though.
JR's loyalty got him a contract he never would have gotten anywhere else playing with anyone else and a ring.
Well said Hud
BAnd that cake is being denied because of the design of a cake. A wedding cake can be used for a wedding no matter any civil rights protected quality of the customers.
You keep speaking of this Abrahamic god but refuse to quantify this.
No - I would need to dig through my archives; but, Australia charges/court case settled those facts and it was quickly swept under the rug. Strangely, it was an Ozzie that made an attempt on QEII & Charles, also. They are a feisty bunch "down under"
"challenging" is the key word. If Jack Phillips feels he wants to fight for an exemption or feels he is being discriminated against by another protected group he has every right to challenge the laws.
Still doesn't make it about atheism. If this one is about anything, it's anti-theism.
"How about the government subsidizing industry with billions of revenue?"
It better be. Or he will have some 'splainin to do.
Jeremiah 23:25-32 KJV I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. (26) How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; (27) Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal. (28) The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD. (29) Is not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces? (30) Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour. (31) Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that use their tongues, and say, He saith. (32) Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the LORD, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the LORD.
"For a multitude of reasons, research on the healing effects of prayer is
How can I disagree with the one woman on disqus who has the exact same sarcastic sense of humor as me??
Considering what drugs do, there's no such thing as a "nonviolent drug offense." Say I just want a little extra money and make meth in my basement. I don't sell it, I don't launder money (as she was convicted of doing). I'm just meeting a consumer need. Every dealer who shoots another dealer or anyone who overdoses is on my hands even though I didn't do it. This woman, however, realizes what she did wrong, admits it, was an ideal prisoner (you don't have to be when you're doing life) and helped other prisoners. Her sentence should have been commuted (as it was) but her crimes were still serious.
and they do. Which is why I'm puzzled at the statement to the converse.
Sorry, no. We won't allow that.
You miss the point. It may not be true but it is still the core belief of Christianity. Why else do you think a saviour is needed?
And just to try to clarify, since we probably speak two different languages: The founders wanted their government informed by religion. I could go dig up quotes on this, but I'm sure you're as aware of them as I am. They wanted separation of church and state, but not freedom from religion. Those of us who believe in God want God's help. He is our father, not an enemy.