all of Europe would be speaking Russian by now it not for the US. so, I think Trump should respond to Mr. Juncker in the words of Colonel Jessup:
She said lefts--- anyways.
Yes, I agree that religion does not belong in science. The question is whether some people's anti-religious bias may limit their scientific inquiries because they are prone to seeing things in a reductivist way, as a reaction against religion.
If you are in favour of killing for bringing political change, there is not much to discuss. I named the two because they are most heard of when one speaks of revolutionaries. The OP is about Muhammad, not about revolution.
This is the thanks I get for explaining why you're confused, and why you don't understand the reactions and comments of others.
Funny how TopCatDC can't express himself accurately.
It happens whenever commutard BLM morons "occupy" (and ultimately trash, of course) the office of some cowardly libtard university chancellor.
You have failed to show any bias...so why not move on?
We can only perceive 4% of the universes and that is a grandiose figure. To assume so much... never forget the flat landers.
Indeed. Religion aside I think that it's important getting the dating right and let the chips fall where they may whether it be form the religious or from the historical communities.
Either way, how is losing support MAGA?
When I think of that, the alternative makes me laugh..."if it comes back to you, it's yours. If it doesn't, hunt it down and kill it."
Yeah, because the more credible story is that an angel came down from heaven and informed a virgin that she would miraculously become pregnant to the son of the creator of the universe. That child was born, grew up and then was humiliated and crucified by the powers that be to die for sins that the first humans garnered at the beginning of time.
Nope. Not at all.
?Pretty obvious to me that life was done on purpose?
Are you referring to his personal things? House, car, dog house etc?
heh heh. Will do.
Obviously, the dictionary may define what it seems to be, yet, it lacks in the emotions that allow beauty to be expressed within one, essential, emotions.
A law which prevents a person from the pursuit of their religion or forces them do do something agai st their religion is unconstitutional.
See Peter Damian on the Mythic Jesus OP from yesterday.
You did ask, so I?m just sayin?...
It?s interesting that you automatically assume it will influence secular governments. I think you?re just falling prey to sensationalized right wing media
Sigh...I don't know how these people live with themselves...