A better question would be why God doesn't send His son, Jesus, right back to earth to finish the job he started before he stupidly got Himself crucified.
Please show me where in the bible it says christian values need to be administered by the government via confiscation and redistribution of wealth.
Oh no! Bro...Im sorry you're too stupid to grasp the seriousness of Obummers fuck ups, but they make Trump look like an alter boy! ???????? But please continue posting your irrelevant replies, they are quite entertaining.
Yes I did. I stand by what I said. The majority of the raping is occurring between the detainees not the guards. There will always be a bad apple in any lot but for the most part most people making that kind of money with benefits is not going to put it in jeopardy.
Religion is the work of the devil.
Good luck next week. Take advantage of the mollycoddling.
So do... nm
LOL - that's awesome. I totally missed the opportunity for a Bolt-Pats joke. :)
What part of the cited article is wrong?
Boring is relative, as it what's reasonable.
Isn't there some kind of teaching about that in that book he's been pounding? Probably a minor character or author, so totally ignorable.
And since you can't demonstrate this god is real, your morals are a subjective interpretation of what you believe this imaginary entity wants. Thus, no more objective than anyone else's...
Creation is an ongoing process unless you are a god.
Ah, so what are you doing then?
Then its at problem with all antiquated historical data. This problem is not unique to the Bible the difference being the preponderance of evidence to support the Biblical narrative. How many witness do we have for Homer, Plato, Aristotle, and Euripides? The answer is none most accounts of these men were written several hundred years after the fact. The four gospels along with Paul's letter were all written within the life time of the witness. All were most likely written before AD 70. History is impossible to prove we can never test it but we can use logic and reason to deduce the most likely narrative to the events based on the available evidence. So it boils down to you have looked at the evidence and determined it to be lacking so be it. I on the other hand look at it and draw a different conclusion. Your conclusion is not better than mine as is mine is not better than yours. Mine has 2000 years of scrutiny and critique and your has about 150 years. The more archeological evidence that is uncovered the more my case is strengthened and yours is weakened. The evidence is not swinging the way of myth it is swinging the way of historical account.
Oh, a 100% on the multitudes of religious assertions vis-a-vis QP. I was thinking of religion in the
I agree. The story must happen before it is written as happened.
Another charge, pile that to the rest of the bullshit you have told me.