Available in Yoga, Buddhism and Hinduism and many others, as you know.
I judge Funkster of the Court Of Monkey
If MY FRIEND puts out after
Care to describe what is so beyond the laws of nature of the quantum world?
Come on: if someone needs evidence to support their faith, is no longer an exercise in faith!
I agree. I always defer to the laws.
How about - first - defining correctly and totally - what "scientific proof" would be. At the present, they do not know what makes Mercury to become 'magnetic' at absolute zero.
Sounds good to me.
Shouldn?t you be flagging everyone?
You see nothing. You certainly are showing signs of delusion and indoctrination.
Tell us about "laws of science" as opposed to "theory," please.
Same here. The next step lasted 20 years.
And on a tenth of the money too.
God is supposedly perfect. Yet he doesn't show much love.
I don't read links on this forum. Christianity is not based on truth. Its based on mind tricks. It brain washes it followers so they will gladly submit to its non sense and give up a substantial portion of their income. Try telling your own truth. If you are capable.
A diesel engine can be understood by ANYONE with the desire to do so for is a mechanical contraption in the physical world... Same for the Reactor.....
Eh right you are. I got my history confused there.
It is not bigotry.
??The students found the burlesque videos, huh? Sure..????
Thanks for the good laugh
- Populations have NOT become MORE genetically diverse across animals. They maintain about the same genetic diversity.
Because morality is not an entity. nor is joy nor passion nor hate.
We wouldn't be where we are today if science rejected the unknown. I never said to accept. I said to not reject. Science has never and will never reject the unknown.
It will be nice to not hear everyone crying into their beer any more. Not until
Check back in after 20yrs and sick of each other. :) (kidding ... sort of. lol)
Just wondering, are you of the "eternal damnation" camp or the "the soul is just destroyed" camp.
Interesting you brought up Jesus being tempted, just as we are.
Yes: Jesus teaches that the man has a moral responsibility in how he perceives the woman, and it's not the woman's fault for being beautiful: it's the man's fault for lusting. Remarkably progressive considering this is a story from an era when women were property.
Meaning there is none.
i am aware whats your point? i think Mueller is doing a through job