Just because things happened or even that the Jews did certain things, I don't have to approve of them. The Jews did many things God didn't approve of either. God wasn't forcing them as slaves to do his bidding. They chose their own path without God many times.
You just don't like that people have an opportunity to actually HAVE a life instead of being damned to poverty and ignorance just because you have an issue with the expulsion of a clump of non-sentient cells. THAT is the time to be responsible. It is NOT responsible to bring another person into this world if you can not care for them properly. You are not creating a LOVING stable environment, and everyone deserves that. Some women CHOOSE to give the child up for adoption, that is also a responsible decision, but you have no right to force ANYONE into making that decision. The day they can force someone to give up blood or an organ against their will to save the life of another, perhaps we can talk about you getting your way.
Nope. I guess my correcting the OP has gone right over your head.
Well there's documented quirkiness that makes for more than hearsay.
Yes - Denmark is a hotbed is chaos and depravity since it's population is almost 90% atheists. /sarcasm
No one gives a shit
Who is saying species came into the scene at once?
What makes you think I'm excited?
"What's your opinion on xyz?"
What3ver fanatical literalist.
I don't, but knowing me I was probably knocked out on a floor somewhere.
Micro devolution. As humans became increasingly distant from the pure state of Adam and Eve before the Fall lifespans decreased.
Where they live, if they're doing better or worse than me, if they volunteer and where. People put allll their business on LinkedIn.
'Lol' generally follows a joke.
Thank you for an excellent article and for being a great moderator.
Yes, and Buddhism.
God is the arbiter of 'truth'.
Families is, kind is family
Why ask when you won't understand.
Cool, then why don't you go to the official NASA youtube site and the official National Academy of Science youtube site etc, etc etc,
This isn't a political issue. Please keep your politics out of this.
He?s a grown man now... in the last year my baby boy became a man !
Black or poor? What?s the Billy Bob and Betty Lou call back percentage?
tsk tsk tsk.
you think a god being crucified is the same as a human and call me dishonest? Talk about rich
It should be noted that even Richard Bauckham (Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, pp. 452-463) argues that both Papias and Polycarp were hearers of a separate ?elder? John, and not John the son of Zebedee. As James McGrath explains in ?Which John? The Elder, the Seer, and the Apostle,? by the time of Irenaeus in the late-2nd century CE, different figures in the early church named ?John??such as John the son of Zebedee, John of Patmos, and John the Presbyter (or, ?elder? John)?had become conflated in their identities. One of the reasons for differentiating John the Elder from John the son of Zebedee, McGrath explains, is the fact that ?Papias mentioned his efforts to find out what a variety of key figures, including John the apostle, said (using the past tense), and also what Aristion and John the Elder say (using the present tense).? This change in tense suggests that Papias is referring to John the son of Zebedee as a past figure, whereas the John the Elder was a subsequent figure, alive during his own day. Due to this ambiguity, and the general unreliability of the available sources, it is untenable that either Papias or Polycarp knew John the son of Zebedee, or any of the twelve disciples.