In my opinion being a bitch isn't a gender specific thing unless you're a dog.
You pieces of shit called Obama every name you could think of and even made some up, so shut you cockhole, you hypocritical fuck.
The question seems to center on the issue of what "most" people think are objective moral standards. "Most" being a category that excludes sociopaths, who by definition do not have a conscience as the term normally connotes - so they don't count. For the rest of us, as others have already said, the question could be framed as: "Name one instance where the violent rape and/or outright premeditated murder of a child is not immoral". Since we've excluded sociopaths, among them "Satanist" and drug cults, etc., I think every non-sociopath would reply, "Of course there is no way in which such a violation/murder is not immoral". Would this not indicate that, among the non-sociopathic population, that there is an objective moral standard, whether or not it comes from simple human empathy or divine mandate?
That doesn?t mean it has anything to do with tarrifs.
None of the above.
Look Robert, I'm not out to fool anyone.
As do I.
You: "He turned someone [a]way from his business because they were gay"
Well. The truth is that had no one been there, none of this would have went the way it had.
Thanks for your usual two cents worth, adjusted for inflation.
I agree this loving good spirit is within all of us. There is also a selfish
That's just a wall of text to me. And none of what you said answers my question about how 20 years here or there would change anything.
I agree, it is WRONG to use only one test, such as carbon dating only to make a scientific claim...as you are doing here. YOU pointed out that carbon dating, which gives a "date range" of a fossil is backed up by counting tree rings, (which debunks your rational by finding that you have faulty methodology by using only ONE test method, in the elementary sense) and as with other methods like carbon dating, scientists used other isotopes with longer half lifes to get a more time frame.
Technically, everyone you can have sex with is someone's child... unless we look into kinkier kinds of sex.
Agreed but we are a far cry from France in terms of both culture and government. While anti-semitism exists here, it is far less pervasive than in Europe as a whole and Germany and France in particular. Add to that our government is not actively hostile to religion and I don't envision a mass exodus of the American Jews short of some compelling reason to immigrate to Israel.
Still imagining Gay sex?
Not to get political and all but..................
Nice misrepresentation. The "left" didn't attack Kanye because he said we should think for ourselves...some on the left attacked him because he said favorable things about Trump...and bumbling his thoughts on slavery didn't help him any either.
You are welcome. have a God blessed day.
"Atheism predicts the world we live in, better than a creator deity."
Whoops, you are right. I may be mistaken about who you are.
That's just it. Using my reason, the bible should be discarded.
Please identify the strawman in my statement.
Yehoveh G-D of Israel is your Creator and is calling you to covenant relationship with him through the One appointed both Lord and Messiah. He has provided a way for you to become part of the greater commonwealth of Israel, the promises and covenants He has made with them.
That would work if they all admitted to being common and fallible and human instead of divine and inerrant and unique.
Straight down it sounds like to me.
Maybe mine is a bit more understandable. So scroll up as I am under new rules not to give you a link. Makes live a bit more difficult for you but that will just teach you Grace.
Well, we do have Archaeopteryx, which is clearly a transitional species between dinosaur and bird....And does have feathers...
Then why did you bring in atheism?
Well, I would have to include adherence to the notion that some sort of divine influence is responsible for the words in the Bible, for a start.
Present evidence of the existence of any of the gods and reveal beliefs I express and the scientific evidence that contradicts them.
"Cops deserve respect"
They clearly don't want my money? I'd be annoyed they wasted my time. Probably would warn friends about them. Other than that? Meh. It's technically illegal here to discriminate like that, but I'm not sure I'd report them. Just doesn't seem like something worth fretting over.
"So when it came down to it, man, accidents happen, man.?
WLC doesn't really "prove" anything, though. He speaks to the subjective, asserts his conclusion within his premise (begging the question) and tosses around equivocation and black-and-white fallacies as if they were candy. He's a terrible debater, IMO.