Once again ladies and gentlemen, another prime example of hate speech displayed by the anti bigot anti hate speech guru
Yes genius, land possessed for 4000 years by people of a RELIGION they want wiped from the face of the earth.
Something wrong with the question.
That would require some manhood. You ain't man enough. keep sucking up the soy, boy...
We don't require women obtaining an abortion to get a consultation from neonatologists.
With respect, you?re wrong. The cage photos were from 2014. Now they?re on cots in climate controlled facilities, being fed and cared for, best they can. Obviously not an ideal situation...maybe outta level the blame at illegal border jumpers, many of whom are human smugglers. They?ve been warned repeatedly. The US doesn?t exist to house, feed, educate, and employ people from the sh!tholes of the world. Nor do we, lest we collapse our already stressed social safety net in an effort to do so.
Genesis 1:3 God creates, the spirit of God is moving over the water, the voice of God (Jesus) commands
We have a resolution channel listed in our guidelines if you wish to discuss our news sources. Such does not belong in the channel. I would suggest that you move along. You can always elect not to comment on the stories that you do not like. Full disclosure: we are happy having adopted mediabiasfactcheck as the arbiter for our sources. It has freed up a lot of moderator resources that used to be spent arguing and debating among ourselves over what to allow.
Is this a trick question? o.O
wolfe and bourdaine were butt buddies?
You can?t blame the listener, it?s a difficult job sometimes to discern what the author is trying to say.
Yep. One weird trick for beautiful skin. Peasant ad hate her
Is this an inflected or non-inflected language? Do nouns have gender? Are there any irregular verbs? Does it have a subjunctive?
Sure but are there invisible $100 bills made of cake frosting?
I don?t see where you mention the incubation period, the nuclear regulatory commission stipulates these protocols, it?s not negotiable and shouldn?t be overlooked based on the long term consequences in relation to engineering discrepancies that can compromise the structural integrity of the facility. The other major problem with nuclear energy is the nuclear waste. We?re over 75 years into the nuclear age and we still haven?t figured out what to do with the waste. The Yucca mountain facility is clearly a failure based on the numerous reports of leaks and contamination. Also, the Fukushima nuclear disaster doesn?t instill confidence within the public about the ramifications of nuclear meltdowns, Japan is still cleaning up the mess and they?re running out of places to store the radioactive water used to cool the reactor. Whether it?s earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, tornadoes and or typhoons, natural disasters are a reality regardless of where these facilities are placed. There are no safeguards to natural disasters, therefore nuclear energy is a dead energy technology until we can modify the process to avoid nuclear meltdowns, one way is the MSR concept but I can?t even confirm that until all the variables are calculated. So based on the time frame in reference to zero energy production during its construction process, nuclear energy wouldn?t work regardless along with our inability to get rid of the waste or even store it.
And on a side note, my world view doesn?t condemn the majority of the planet to an eternity in hell... you worship a evil being.
It is just not reported I the same way. Numbers do not lie people lie about numbers.
The only place Gillette goes to on a regular basis is Fact Free Zones.