Well, rereading your wording more carefully, I see that your judgmental phrasings were directly targeted towards the Creationist mentality, so never mind.
I betcha Trump does LOL
Samantha sure is a classy broad. Funny how the left has no problem with this vulgar spew yet they find so many other things offensive. You look like the missing link is over the top but calling a young woman a c*nt is just her expressing her opinion. Ivanka should walk up and punch her in the mouth.
Yes we have a great President that they can?t and won?t deal with....
Careful...He will come back and throw a "scotsman" at you...
Ok. This is the second OP on upgrading. The question is here if Wisdom will do that. Seeing that it benefited Solomon. Then we will have no need for laws and interpretation of laws. And we will have no need for others to rule us. We can then all be a happy Family.
Any sensible person would rather that unwanted pregnancies don't happen. They do.
How about "odd and quirky" can I define you down to "odd and quirky"?
Some think it is and will not accept evolution. It is just where the theists want to insert themselves into the picture. There are a whole host of theories that they apply and then there are those that say god created everything perfectly and they are exactly as god created.
Most BDSM people would be with you burning that trash, for all the reasons you say. Its not BDSM, its abuse. And there were a number of folks in the BDSM community that spoke out about it, there were a number of news stories bout how it got everything wrong.
"Really... you use unleavened wafers for communion? That seems suspiciously Jewish."
What you and Mell said is 100%. And this is what makes me even more sad.
I preferred Rihanna in the gold :o/
I can handle the truth just fine. It does not mean it isn't harassment of vulnerable women. I know that you and your kind are comfortable with that, but I do not for a minute think that the majority of Conservatives subscribe to the brand of Far Right hateful conservatism that you do.
Religion invalidates itself because there are too many of them. Most of the ones I've heard of are simply ridiculous. Some followers are rational people otherwise. But when it comes to religion they believe in the craziest things. I've never internalized any of them, although I was raised a Christian. For me its "put up or shut up". None of them have put up anything.
I personally disagree that the fetus is "a part of her," however, as Yvonne stated she didn't want this to become an abortion debate, I will respect that and not pursue the argument further.
I've been addressing this logical flaw in another thread, if you're interested:
"To be reasonable is to say that the human brain is calibrated to something we call 'truth'. "
Regarding the first question about evolution creating another sapient sentient life here on Earth.
Very true, and people often get into casual relationships knowing it's going to end with a little bit of hurt -- either from beginning to want someone they'll never have or becoming an object of unwanted affections. I do see many people blowing that natural part of the casual relationship out of proportion because they think hookups are how relationships are supposed to start (in fact the only way in some people's minds, smh).
Typically, most people stand during the national anthem. But yes players specifically should be held to a higher standard.
If the Bible is not correct, is there a book that is more correct than the Bible? And how do you prove there is a book better than the Bible? Or prove there is no such book?
I thought this case was a one-off but apparently it's not. Just read about another guy who mixed the pill into his gf's tea.
Jesus was a carpenter, in a time and a part of the world where everything was made of rock
Legal temporary migrant workers. Or pay a wage that attracts people.
Man made a choice to reject God, therefore he is under the law of sin and death. If you made an android do you want one that can learn and grow or one that follows orders without question?
Past laws against interracial marriage violated the right to form a real marriage in a way that laws defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman do not violate it. The argument about what the equal rights of all citizens entail for marriage laws turns on how marriage is defined. If marriage is, by its very nature, oriented toward procreation, the refusal to redefine it to accommodate two men does not ?discriminate? against them any more than the military does against the flat-footed.
a sex camel?
If only everyone would do that.
>>"Jesus is irrelevant."<<