I think you meant that comment to be directed at RebelRose.
Doctrine does not constitute proof.
Name calling and ignoring expert advice. Yep, you are a liberal.
Start off with your explanation of the mechanisms that God uses to create things and we'll take it from there. That's not asking any more of you than your request for the natural mechanism that resulted in us being here. If you are so sure it creates things and it created everything you must have some idea or the entire God idea simply becomes absurd. You might just as well then say Superman did it.
you poor bastige!..
Hmm, not my experience. We eat healthy and it costs us more than buying cheap junk food would. What are you basing that on?
Ummmmm yeahhhhh I'm gooona Need a follow up report on that issue in blue font on color coded TPS coversheets... My office space impression... For the day...
While I?m sure those are beautiful to some, they just make me cringe >.<
Good morning, hope everyone is well and has a nice day
So God is only on the side of better equipped armies. Is that what you are stating?
I feel a connection with nature when I hike in the forests of Oregon. Abundant ferns. Are these guys my distant cousins to the 'nth power cubed?'
WTF? Birth control birth control is not 100%. If you are having sex with someone, and you or your partner are not infertile or sterilized, there is a chance of pregnancy.
All of science. Wake up. You...go find a single example of a true split developing internal barriers where gene flow stops. Go find one example of this split developing novelty. Observable is scientific right? We all know the tools are there, genetics...but nothing.
The article makes an argument and cites facts to back it up. You simply dismissed. Not the same thing.
We'll miss you! <3
That's not a prank, that's just vandalism. A Senior prank is stealing the VIPs Big Boy statue, Or the Pep boys statue and putting it on the roof.
the ndp will increase the PST, FOR SURE.
lol, "the bible counsels you, to do it now"
Yes of course, and those of us who are lucky not live in a society dominated by religion, are lucky!
Onward Christian Soldier.
No, you asked a question to dislodge from having to answer directly.
How about an airstrike fuckstick ?
There is more connection between authoritarian religious regimes (like a Muslim theocracy) and the authoritarian ideological regimes of Stalin, Mao, Hitler, etc., than exists between murder and atheism.
To summarize the criticism from the expert majority: This 'third way' doesn't actually say anything new regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in genetics, and it proposes one new and wholly unsubstantiated thing ('natural genetic engineering') to add to natural selection, while at no point making a case against natural selection's ability to achieve what is observed. So far, 'the third way' is an odd mixture of sensationalism and baseless speculation.
The steel company raised the price. Tarriffs were part
You seem a little too well informed about their bungholes. ;-)
Well, there's supernatural mind fluff and brain farts, a combination that leads to the belief in the sex obsessed spy in the sky magic muffin himself, Yahweh / God / Jesus / Allah. One quarter of that thing is supposed to be returning to earth in a mixed fibre garment, but disappointingly is a no show so far.
But you don't worry about Islamic superiority thinking by so many of their religious leaders? You're more worried about a commentator on disquss?
Lol. Must be 10 or 15 percent of local population on Ambien. Yeah, that splains it.
We see quantum actions happening without understanding the cause. That does not mean there is no cause.
I am quite familiar with the works of Funk, Borg and Crossan. Having worked with them I do have an insider's opinion. I disagree with your statement. Their views are not an attempt to salvage a moralistic credibility for Christianity but to sipher through the various traditions and extrapolate the most probable Jesus. Whether correct or not is not really relevant at this point since all including Schweitzer fall under the minimalist umbrella and work against the literalist, fundamentalist view of the historical Jesus. My personal view would be more on the side of Robert Eisenman and James Tabor.
I agree with everything you said.
"Maybe the best scenario would be God-to-human, unmediated communication."