Maybe after you're done smearing autistic people you can explain how it is that your personal, private definitions of "deism" and "omnipotence" and "empirical knowledge" should be the operating definitions in our "conversation". Because if you don't, you're simply arguing that your emotional attachment to the way you use words is extraordinarily important to you. Which is interesting, from a psychological perspective about why humans hold irrational beliefs, but it doesn't tell me much else about whether there is evidence for God. And as has been said before, the fallacy of equivocation is one children literally use in kindergarten, and has no place in serious conversations.
i think hes making a joke..
Not insane? I think that anyone that murders complete strangers is insane by definition. No sane person does that. Now maybe you can cite psychological studies that make that claim, but at the very heart, it is always a mental issue. Put mental issues and mass murder together and I don't know how you don't conclude insanity. But I am no expert so I will not belabor the point. Just a personal observation.
I tend to disagree, but to each their own.
Who do you think put the cats in the trees? :)
I have over 20. I wonder what that means?!
"gnostic" is knowing. "Agnostic" is not knowing. So an agnostic theist, believes there probably is a god, but isn't so sure that it rises to the level of knowing absolutely that there is a god.
The bible is often debunked myth
Start with rolling back some of the Dodd-Frank idiocy that has been killing small banks and then look at the billions that businesses have saved from the reduction in other Federal Regulations.
Don't know. But it appears that way since some parts of Africa and the Mid East still practice slavery. And before the White man came along many places were practicing ritual sacrifice and slavery. But the Enlightenment had more to do with the abolition of both than did Christianity.
They in fact did repeal the ban. Good for them.
Those are the words of paul, not GOD.
Right! We need riots in the street.
Beauty is a subjective experience. There is no beauty to be found in an object. The experience of beauty is the proof of beauty. There is no 'evidence' of it at all beyond the subjective experience of it. Neither beauty nor self-recognition need validation from the 'objective' realm to make them legitimate.
Hope they can breathe
"Trade wars are easy to win"
Trump's "reasoning" for Canada's tariffs is NATIONAL SECURITY.
You want 10 year olds to give consent! Condemned by your own words! You are such a disgusting and degenerate pedophile!
"micromanagement of our lives"
Hi loretta ... you didn't read my post closely. I wrote in the 2nd paragraph
You?re right about that.
Owwwwwwww.... I'm male...
Ok stupid. Feminized as in favoring femine vice masculine behavior.
It's peaceful, but it has major drawbacks. One being: you only know a select group of people for an extended amount of time.
It's def tough to deal with...
You're still wrong, Gillette. Your side *wants* to make this a Freedom of Speech case, but it's not. Phillips denied them service BEFORE any discussion of decoration, wording, toppers or the like was even discussed! He flatly refused them service for a publicly available item *simply* because they were a GAY couple. And that's when he chose to break the law.
There are countless sects and interpretations of the Bible and what it means to each believer in a source-guide of higher-mindedness. God avails many books, many star systems, and many metaphors.
Do you think only God's work can be charitable?
Right, how dare I use the only pic in the article to post this discussion!
Do you guys EVER give that rivalry shit up?