It's not about me. So no can do. Unless I figure out a way to make it about me.
Interesting scenario, Sir Tainley. Here's my take:
I must have been hungry. I ate the R! Must edit.
The devil, it says, was no ordinary arch angel but third in command. He was anointed. He altered or twisted the words of God. That's all evil is. Its not creating anything, but altering it. Gods truth was twisted just a bit, half truths and also presented to mankind. There's a 'vulnerability' dealing in love. It says God is love. You have risk waiting on the other side to follow through on their part. That's where the fall happened. Mankind chose to side with this twisted version. It's separate from God. Holy...unholy. They can't be together, one destroys the other..logically.
Some people let the evil in hem become dominant.
We usually label an action immoral when it is committed by someone that has the capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. Are you suggestion god did not understand what he was commanding in the old testament? This is the being that is claimed to be Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnipresent (omnibenevolent is also included sometimes).
The problem is there is no input that results in data being received for the brainwashed.
?Happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us ? he who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.? (Psalm 137:9)
What was the name of it?
There is only one vector for weight. . .and that is 'down.' Any lateral force he had to apply to make this thing balance is still there, in the form of the stored kinetic energy that will be released when he sneezes, causes a slight breeze, and the washer thumps to the podium.
An infinite god who lives infinitely doesn't have infinite patience? Thought he was perfect.
Prednisone made my hair fall out, my enamel thinner, aaaand made my mouth skin slough off. No more prednisone ever.
You made the allegations, yet have no courage to back up your statements.
Only if the grow in the yard. I am a very expensive nut.
Awwwww, still triggered from that argument you lost three weeks ago? :(
Francisco just wants a memento. He's a veritable pack rat, he is.
So the Last Supper never happened?
We have someone in denial.
Look at the number of shootings and number of shooting victims, not just the homicide rate.
At best, regarding the religious aspects, it can only be taken figuratively. There are far too many flaws, contradictions, etc... to pretend that collection of stories is some literal truth.
My 1st was 20/20, a spreadsheet that ran on Digital Equipment Corporation's (remember that company) PDP/11, TOPS/10, and VMS operating systems.
Godly... imaginary... sounds about right that you equate the two.
Treating your slaves well (giving them only corrective beatings when necessary, ensuring they get enough to eat that they aren't stealing, not selling their children until they're 5 or so) is an example of objectively moral activity.
If they turn to the other gal and dive into splooge faced carpet munching...maybe?
I think we can agree to disagree. Have a nice day. But remember life is finite and I encourage you to seek the truth that is in the Bible.
I thought you were asking for all of those! You were wearing clothes!
7 years with ALL that discussion and no ring? No ?
"Your punctuation is questionable and your facts are inaccurate."
A lot of these turds are likable people. Some are even good looking people. Some are charming people. Some agree with us politically. BUT principles aren't principles if we only apply them to people who we don't like instead of ones we do. He created a zero tolerance policy that got other people fired for the very same thing he did in the White House. He was also an older, powerful man and she was a young girl with dreams of Jack Kennedy in her eyes. She wanted to be Marilyn Monroe. He was no Jack and she was no Marilyn and the DNC lost a little bit of its soul that year.
No prob. :)
Because those are the arguments put forth by the baker's lawyers, aren't they? They are trying to make the case something that it's NOT. This is not a freedom of speech issue, this is flagrant disregard for the standing non-discrimination laws already in place in both Colorado and Federal law.
It is the role of peer review that prevents what you assert. Evolution is inarguably one of the most peer reviewed concepts in all of science.
"Not all "religion" is "business." Would that less of it were!"
I do know.