Well, it was a controlling, abusive relationship. She ended up having to get a restraining order when they finally broke up. I have seen relationships like that and been in one myself, so I am probably biased, but that's why it bothers me.
Christians are not a direct threat. Not even close...
You say he is a taxpayer, and he says he isn't.
I contend that without superstition controlling the thoughts of people in Europe for over a thousand years that so much more could have been accomplished.
The part of this story that has not been well reported is that Monica made her own bed. Yes,she had an illicit affair of sorts with Clinton, a consensual affair. But the publicity that has caused her so much pain came about because she spilled the beans about it to a supposed friend who recorded her phone conversations and was then convinced by her publicist to turn them over to a out of control prosecutor who had been trying to get something, anything, on Clinton for more than 4 years with no success until there was Monica. Ask yourself this question, given the consensual nature of it, (she was 24) would she have suffered such embarrassment and pain had she just kept the relationship strictly between Clinton and herself?
Facebook and Twitter are ruining lots of lives. For some reason, users feel the need to post anything that will draw them attention, no matter the consequences to others. Then the sheep read these posts and start baaing in unison.
On a much more serious note.
The whole Awan family was employed and all making 6 figure salaries.
hogg wouldn't make it as a wac, much less in todays military..
I think it's a good stance to take: you'd like measures that reduce the total number of unwanted pregnancies so pregnancy stops being an option that needs to be discussed. So having children is a blessing instead of a consequence/punishment.
*gasp* Turkey bacon is amazing!
That is absolutely false. A rice cooker puts out the same amount of heat and does not fail.
JFHC. Would you people put up or shut up already! Pull out of the Refugee Convention you keep complaining about but allow to remain in force, announce a moratorium on acceptance of regular immigration applications, and thereby risk proving or disproving your little Shirley McClain school of economics. Will an end to American immigration policy as we have known it for 150 years truly produce the magical utopia you keep promising? Why do you keep making it about the experiences of people instead of introducing the policy changes that would enable you to test your actual political theory? You appear totally unwilling to walk your talk and that sure makes it look like you're not interested in anything but endlessly yearning in your impotency.
I'm not going to read all that rhetoric. I am not trying to buy or sell anything from the baker. I am just settling for the idea that since the baker's morals are opinions written in a book by ignorant, uneducated, gullible people, he's no more rational than his book. There is nothing unnatural about homosexuality. It's been about 3 or 4% of the human population for as long as we can tell. The Bible describes a lot of things as sin that people seem to ignore. Does he apply the same standard to all of the Bible's sins? Does he even follow every single one of them? I bet not. If not, he is a bigoted hypocrite.