First day of vacation!
Again, you are pointing to precedent, not the constitution.
. I have yet to see any of you be able to do that
Maybe, I'll lay money many of the regulars did not use the poll. Some folks just dislike polls.
The Romans finally decide to do away with him because he's claiming to be King of the Jews. And Caesar's already recognized that Herod's king of the Jews.
Truer words, my friend...
But by very definition one can only be deemed a racist if those actions are performed to assign said label. If you never do anything with those thoughts and such, you aren't labeled a racist. That is the nexus of this entire argument. To give you an example, if someone 'thinks' that children are sexually attractive and then broadcasts that desire on a public forum... Sure, they haven't performed any action that is par for discriminatory action technically. But you see how long they'll keep a job if they are interacting with children say as a teacher, day care attendant, or pediatrician etc where the main clientele is children. That is the same proponent when it comes to racism. If you are THINKING horrible thoughts about a group of people, you probably shouldn't be put in a position where how you think has the potential to harm them, impede their progress [say if you work in a corporate setting], or otherwise negatively affect their lives. This is what employers have to think about. If you work at Urban Outfitters and you happen to strip on a pole to make ends meet, because that action normally does not affect how you may view customers or how you interact with your coworkers, it is asinine to me to compare racism to something like homosexuality and/or stripping. Namely, I agree to a degree with your viewpoint, however, like most things in life, it's not a black/white scenario across the board.
Because I think it's a useless killing honestly
He regularly offers the service. He never checked the design. They never got that far. He refused them a service because they were gay.
I don't know of any Christian business trying to not serve homosexuals. No business with premade product is telling any homosexuals, "no product for you". The Christian business are just not wanting to be part of a sin, i.e. homosexual marriage. Why the left and homosexuals won't deal with facts is just childish.
"Oy! This is my Ararat! Go find your own!"
What the heck are you talking about - DoD? I think you are losing your mind. The DoD was never even brought up.
I found my 50!
You mean that's how it sounds to a fallible and very limited human? I imagine it does.
for the winners
When the Romans conquered the Jews it resulted in mass murder.
No, it wasn't. Those are the rules for indentured Israelite - not foreigners.
As the saying goes, I will defend your right to practice your religion. I will oppose you, though, if you try to force others to adopt that religion or if you try to impose your religious beliefs on others.
LOL @ does it have a penis? Yep? Easy. Dead.
Actually, no, only SOME historical Jesus studies. Particularly those by unbelievers. It is only natural that studies by liberals and non-believers give false reports.
"WHO AM I" 'nufsaid
Whoa Whoa Whoa...Youre offering up a jumbalaya of issues I don't even agree with.
I do not PRESUME, it IS.
And again, that the "son" came out with new rules says differently. Before that everyone went to hell right? What changed? Because it sounds like god had a change in mind and his attitude in the bible changes dramatically. Again, did you read the old testament and compare it to the new one? Because he spends entire chapters ranting against those that "turn away" from him. That seems like a dramatic change to me.
Apparently you don't.
I was asleep! Just woke up...stopped working last year...sorry to hear you still must...not working is The Better Way.
My wife has never had a female doctor including her Ob-Gyn when she was younger. I think it depends on the dr and the patient
True true..... It would be difficult to misinterpret that Cain killed able and that's not something we should do.... which would suggest that a "false prophet" would be justifying going against that.... including any "world view" that may come up on the scene to justify it.... That would just be "rotten fruit."
Those nations were only "developed" because of Christianity. Dismissing Christianity's influence and contribution to science is not really logical. Most of the great thinkers of the Middle Ages and the Enlightenment period were devout Christians (Galileo, Copernicus, Isaac Newton, Da Vinci, Michelangelo, etc).
An impersonator could replace him at the meeting with trump and this administration would never know, even if the impostor spoke english to trump, with a NY accent.
A very poor analogy.
Speaking of deflection, nice job trying that.
It is only a "concept" in the same way gravity is a "concept." It merits no more disgust than one might hold for gravity's tendency to injure those who jump off tall buildings.
Yeah, there are. Still. According to Jews, Jesus didn't fulfill prophecies. Not their fault you're ignorant about religious beliefs beyond your own.