Oh yes, on the basis of an intelligence directing it. However, atheists accept the theory that it happened accidentally. As it started by itself with such mathematical order that turned into this fantastic word, a miracle so to speak. Consequently, even Einstein was amenable to the existence of a superior intelligence due to this phenomenon.
But your Jesus hole, it needs to be filled by death-cultism!!!!! Accept god's metaphysical hole filling protrusion.
How is expelling someone from a restaurant because of what she does for a living go against someone?s morals. It was done for spite and mean spiritedness.
Jeff Sessions thinks so. Trump hired someone who wants to make drug laws tougher.
That is an ethnic issue, not even close to the race issue in the US.
Very well. Let me change my response. Self aggrandizement is a trait of ?some? successful people.
Where did we leave things off?
I'm going to be here a while...
I am not asking you to live up to my standards. I was just surprised because I thought your own standards were higher. I did not ask you to watch the video, it's only offered in case you are open minded and interested to challenge your belief about demons not existing.
Lol i wouldn't have you arrested papi
Every warm moist day in the south is SSD.
TeeJ, I agree that women can ruin men's lives with false rape allegations. And that woman, who did that to you, she deserves a special place in hell for it. I have nothing but empathy for you in that situation. And obviously I could be as biased as the next person, but I don't think I've ever heard men speak as passionately and with as much empathy for women who are victims of rape as I do when men speak from place when they were never even convicted of a false rape allegation but fear for it and fear for other men. Does that make sense? *edited to add that I appreciate the maturity and directness and well thought out response TeeJ...so thank you for the good dialogue.
i know their just awful these days, wish they'd go back to moonlight ladies
I understand. Many people have raised interesting points but I keep going back to the fact that everything they mention also happens to girls but one group is still much more likely to kill than the other.
The Bible is not really saying "speciation" because the whole concept was beyond the pre-scientific minds of the Bible writers. That's not a put-down, just an observation.
And thank you! Great insights!
Well luckily I have chest pillows.
To what extent thought ought we be responsible for those in other nations?
I don't. Therefore your claim is bullshit. Not that I imagined much else, considering your clear hatred towards non-Christians, and especially atheists.
The question seems to center on the issue of what "most" people think are objective moral standards. "Most" being a category that excludes sociopaths, who by definition do not have a conscience as the term normally connotes - so they don't count. For the rest of us, as others have already said, the question could be framed as: "Name one instance where the violent rape and/or outright premeditated murder of a child is not immoral". Since we've excluded sociopaths, among them "Satanist" and drug cults, etc., I think every non-sociopath would reply, "Of course there is no way in which such a violation/murder is not immoral". Would this not indicate that, among the non-sociopathic population, that there is an objective moral standard, whether or not it comes from simple human empathy or divine mandate?
It *seems* to have stumped you for a proper response. :)
In a way, they are both deceased
Which Jews, the conservative, the orthodox or the reform?
I don?t know, it depends on how serious the issue is. I feel like we?ve all grown comfortable with accepting opinion and agreeing to disagree as a way to not offend particularly with the current political climate. If it?s someone I care about and it?s an issue I deem important, I?m more inclined to ask them how they arrived to that viewpoint and what were their sources to shape it. And maybe I?ll go read or investigate and offer a rebuttal with my viewpoint as well. At the end of the day, even if they don?t agree, the most important thing for me is that I feel supported and understood (and vice versa).
No it's not you Ascension, he just isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. I went into the council chamber no less than 50 times to see RoFo and DoFo in action and can honestly state that man just doesn't have the smarts for a job this big. He barely handled the council position.
1. No, I do not disagree with Darwin because I understand what he meant by 'the fittest' and he did not mean 'fittest to survive'.
"By your standard, can the man who impregnated her be charged with causing serious bodily harm?"
Violence has a purpose at times as long as it doesn't go over the top....
Grrrrrrr.......yes. Who knew my newspaper thing would draw just as much conversation. lol.
Bye, we wont miss you!
No problem...I totally understand THAT point. Cheers!
An atheist would be hedonist because life is limited, there is no justice, and pleasure is the greatest calling.