This is honestly something I've never understood about our justice system. If the person committing the crime clearly did want the victim or victims dead, carried out the crime, and its only by pure luck no one was murder.....then it should be treated as murder....period.
I already tried making that argument.
I've seen them parroting the talking points that Neo-Nazis have about Israel.
Meanwhile, same person when Obama was nominating Sotomayor and Kagan, and Clinton put in Ginsburg:
Mmmmm nice purrrrrrrrfect. Now the string quartet needs silk or cotton blindfold?
Your original graphic stated:
The only thing is possible injury, it wasn't made for intercourse and doctors say more disease can be spread this way because more blood vessels can be damaged? When and if you do it, have band-aids, jic : )
Well the Bible is seen. Why do you base your faith on it?
"ugly repulsive bug-eyed pig"
That would not bother me as he did not perform any miracles at that time (if we follow what is written in NT).
I think you're right about the mentality behind it. I kept thinking before things like "Maybe because there's no dogs/ significantly bigger dogs in the big dog area?" Or "Maybe they think their dog is classified as small?"
Keep at it and maybe it will come to you.
To state one way or the other without taking the context of ajatnit talking about or what it teaches is just a really dumb question.....
I recall (dimly, to be sure) nuns teaching me before my first Communion that what differentiates humans and animals is that animals can't sin, and neither can children who haven't reached "the age of reason," which seems to be around 8 or 9 years old. Based on that logic, Catholicism shouldn't have much of an opinion on the morality of aborting something that won't get to be human for almost a decade. Of course, I had no idea at that time (the early 1950s) that there was such a thing as an abortion. It simply wasn't discussed anywhere I was around.
It is friday, right?
so, cutting 6 inches off the top and attaching it to the bottom, won't work? Dammit
Lol, it fits.
Well, since you're not well-versed in the Bible, you're not qualified to make that statement.
Sorry, but Wiccans (witches) have been around that long. Does that witches or 'gay' people can be edited out of the bible if they are no longer seen as dangerous? I severely doubt it! Something/someone previously seen as 'moral' was, with the change of one word, suddenly available for murder by the unchangeable biblical morality. Sounds extremely subjective to me.
Because some Christians are such assholes and they really really need to push their religion on to others so they even go knocking on innocent peoples doors?
They believe they are working on saving their neighbors from god's wrath. Who are you to say they're wrong?
President Trump....?I am above the law and can if I want...pardon myself?.
You repeat what you are fed. Sad.
Soon to be followed by 200 more and only for ONE year. WTF is with that! How much of a commitment message does that send?
An ex friend of mine was, I believe, such a boring individual that he made up stories left and right just to one up me. He actually tried making me believe that he wrestled with Stone Cold Steve Austin and The Undertaker. (He was obese and not healthy at all.) Bless his heart. I didn't have it in me to call him a liar.
More than his sense of smell requires to be professionally checked out.
Trump can take off, eh?
Except that you think a fetus is a human. A human life is introduced into "the situation" when it is born/able to survive outside the womb. Don't women factor into your libertarian beliefs at all? How can you be a libertarian for fetuses and not for women?
Perhaps time to go back and hit the history books there.
Like the tolerant left attacking conservatives in protests?