Safe, legal, and rare is something I'd be more likely to be behind as a libertarian. Despite finding it morally at odds with MY beliefs, If it was those three things, I'd lean more towards accepting it being legal across the board. (Despite finding it morally deplorable none the less).
Sponsors/Godparents are involved in baptism no matter your age.
"Having already exposed your ignorance I need say no more."
No. On a scale of 0-100, just how sure are you that an intelligent Creator of the universe exists?
Yes she'd curse out the dirt numerous times ??????
Heretic. It was last Thursday.
Two old coots that snould learn when to
Let's get back to the point here. We are talking about god. (Beauty just being an analogy.)
I have been trying to but you all are so distracting!
Supporting the death penalty for any of these "crimes" is ridiculous and unethical as hell.
Why even respond?
Lmao!!! Thank God I didn't, but I was pretty drugged up I dont think I would care if I did.
Yes, you leftys think the movies are real...
"By your standard, can the man who impregnated her be charged with causing serious bodily harm?"
stay at home mom's can do a lot or the bare minimum.
??? It is in a number of articles. Sorry if you don?t know the president?s Business history.
SoS. Do you generally support the opinions of ancient uneducated nomadic nincompoops, as a self professing Physicist with a doctorate?
Actually, I do get to decide that, especially since nothing that you responded with challenged anything that I said. You not agreeing with my decision is another matter and irrelevant in relation to my decision. But to the point, first you said that you were responding to the original posters references to the United States and when that was demonstrated to be false, you changed the dynamic to skin color which you falsely claim to have corrected him in relation to. IOW, you're doing what most people who cannot defend their comments do, your changing the dynamics of the dialog to attempt to make your comments relevant because you were demonstrated to be wrong. To bad for you that there is a record of this entire dialog that demonstrates that you're being, at best, disingenuous.
In a digital age there need not be any leader. Everyone could speak for themselves.
Tacitus though was pretty specific in connecting Chrestus to the Christians. He's either connecting Chrestus to a particular Jesus/Yeshua/Joshua that is connected to the Christian cult or to a person and calling him Chrestus. I think the validity of connecting Jesus to Tacitus' "Chrestus" is pretty good, as I don't know who else you would connect the title to among the early Christians.
... Friends... They are like layers on a parfait... Some are on top and get eaten... some are the dribbles that end up on the table... I usually end up on the bottom of a shoe...