Its your ignorance..not mine.
The term "mental illness" implies brain malfunctioning and/or neuro-chemical defect. Or maybe you have another definition. If I kill my cheating lover, what does "snap" have to do with it? Many people use the term "snapped" as if there was no conscious decision involved, but people voluntarily choose to pull the trigger.
Your hilarious! The MSM didn't seem to want to get to the truth on FAST and Furious, the IRS scandal, the Iran deal, or the Hillary "investigation"!
Awww you tried really hard to defend a racist here.
There are thousands of religions, and billions of people that think they have the correct objective morality.
Science doesn't do 'Truth-with-a-capital-T'. Science does falsifiable explanatory models supported by observations.
If you think that is funny you are 1 in a million.
I argued that it isn't cumulative this change onward to big structural change
I want to make a small distinctinction that is significant though I think. I think it's important to distinguish being saved by faith in Jesus and being saved through following Jesus' teachings. A key point in Protestantism is salvation through faith <alone> and not through works or even a combination of faith and works. This does not in any way absolve us from following Jesus' teachings of course. But this follows from faith and salvation, it does not precede it. The thief on the cross produced no fruit of works, but it was his mere faith that led Jesus to say that he would be with him.
More often than not, it's projection rather than deflection.
When I reference understanding prejudice, I remember in the 80's, my grandfather needing stitches because he had to hold a friend back who wanted to fight Japanese visitors to their automotive plant. This man, who I knew and I would hardly describe as racist, quite the opposite actually, but he had fought in the pacific in WW2 and had been a POW. Even in his 50's or 60's by that point, he still held a deep hatred for the Japanese. I am not saying it is necessarily acceptable, but I can understand it. I don't believe this is something cherished, but it is often deep ceded because of experiences or learned beliefs and behavior. Many older people today, the Fox News Demo, were born before or during the Civil Rights era and may have had parents or community leaders that taught them integration was wrong. Most will acknowledge that equality was the right thing to do, but they only came around on it, it wasn't something they had championed. Many of these same people even after the fact, loathed people like Ali or Jane Fonda because they were taught that these people were anti-American (Fonda I more understand). I am not saying this is at all acceptable, only that these are people and they are flawed, they aren't inherently evil or immoral in most cases. Belief and indoctrination leads people to advocate abhorrent things and isn't isolated only to religion but can be found in cultural teachings and beliefs. An example is that It seems a lot of far right conservatives only come around on gay rights when they have a gay relative. It was the experience that opened their beliefs up for change.
I think it's too important culturally to do that... and I don't think we should be scared of ideas. We should embrace them and critique them and give them a good hard thrashing.
If he's down by 20 should he play the full 48 mins?
I belive we are created beings, made by a perfect being....
You mess with me you sleep wit da fishes! Kapeesh?
I'm sure the people who view themselves as Palastinians might have a different view.
In this instance it is about making judgements immediately. While I see prophesying as Creating Ability manifesting in the future.
And he hardly ever came home to visit. Even at thirty he was still wandering around jobless, crashing at peoples houses or outdoor, unmarried and causing trouble. What's a mother to do?
Please walk me through how EITHER of those examples constitutes Obama implicitly OR explicitly calling for violence.
If a person is a doctor and saves lives daily is he a good moral person? What if that doctor is also a serial killer?
Creationism is not against evolution. Even YECers believe in rapid evolution.
You're right that we can't disprove the Loch Ness Monster or elves or Banshees. Same with God. Or the same w/ "infinite regresses" of the teleological arguments for God's existence.
Agreed, and I do believe sexual incompatibility should be grounds for a breakup.
Or in other words...
Step #1: resign-fired from exec dir.
Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor-- and whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.
Ratzinger was guilty as all hell.
You have gone on another one of you rants.
It is not a given that the remaining 8 justices will vote to overturn it, since Trump may not get Congress to pass his SC nominee unless he miraculously wins a second term.
English of course, the King James bible is written in English.
False. That is YOUR false and biased interpretation of the evidence. We all have the same evidence bub.
Are you implying you don't wipe with your hands? You are truly in the .01% it would appear.
"no marital relations renders a marriage separated or on grounds of negligence awarding to the desiring spouse"
Good morning, hope everyone is doing well. I am going to be a little selfish and post a picture of a man that 74 years ago this morning was landing on Omaha Beach. Please remember all the young men who never made it off that beach today