I have no idea what yur on about. I may have to go all JAW on you then claim I'm happy.:)
Good summary, by the way.
Okay, show me the part of the judgment saying Phillips had the legal right to do this
every land mass on earth is an island
Remember Rob Ford married her. Why do you think Rob had such bad judgement?
1. If it is, it should be neither compulsory, nor for spurious reasons of any sort, be they medical or religious.
Not man enough to be the father of "his" kids. LOL
No, you will not change based upon evidence, because there is more than enough evidence now. Jesus spoke concerning people who, like you, will not listen to the evidence that God has already provided.
Disbelieve in your mysticism carries with it the disbelieve in the penalty. It is absolutely irrational to bring that up. The only thing that that shows is your inability to emphasise.
I WILL be the first to open my mouth and shove in my whole leg.
All the deity based cults are the exact same dangerous nonsense.
Well, all these scriptures state that very thing implicitly - i.e. that the Christian is not under law, therefore only the Israelite (or, more properly, the Jew) is. Paul writes about those under law and those not under law (1 Corinthians 9 v 20-21), distinguishing Jew and Gentile.
How do you know he is disgruntled.
Keep on studying. I am not going to re-post all of the Bible texts that deny your view, so take it or leave it as you will. You are finished here.
Ha! I'm getting the hang of your syntax now :)
I like the part about the acceptance. It makes sense in my head. :)
FWIW, in my mid 20's I was resigned to the "fact" that I'd never get SS. Thirty years on I'm looking forward to the check (as a supplement, not a retirement plan) in a few years. It's the third rail. By your time however it will actually be out of money as opposed to just knowing that it's going to be out of money.
We are not discussing other countries.
Resist arrest and you get punched in the face.
they were punished...how does any law prevent anything?? People will still break them. In all your examples the law served justice to the guilty. What more can be done in your opinion?
Add money into the mix, and it's pretty damn hard to convict a white male.
Then what you state can't be true unless it can be proven.
So expressing a sense of humor via a play on words is something that you deem censor worthy?
Nope. As usual it is difficult to figure out what you are actually trying to say, but nope. It simply means that there are many competing religions that are all 100% convinced that only their religion is correct. This is an obvious fallacy.
Bullshit, Trump advocated violence towards PEACEFUL protesters at his rallies and there's plenty of proof of him doing so.
I claim that inherent human rights are based on the existence of a creator. So, therefore, human rights are not something that can be imposed?
Acts 13:36 Paul indicates that Jesus did not decay like Kind David. This is not something he was claiming was figurative, he was saying that he literally rose from the dead after he died on that cross.
Perhaps you misunderstand me. The "original families", cats, canine, bovine, etc that you think of, themselves came from, much earlier, the same species.