I think the decision is inappropriate - punishment should be reserved for those who did something wrong; not those who may have done something wrong.
Yeah his response made no sense...maybe he was going for the angle that only a small percentage of all the women he had around him complained lol
Truth is, words like "stupidity" downgrade the conversation.
You do have an annoying habit of asking the most naive questions.
The corrupting influence of city life was observed as far back as the tower of Babel. While I agree that the cosmopolitan environment is good for challenging beliefs that are held out of mere tradition, it does a terrible job of building anything healthy in place of it.
Do Dingos and Northern European Canines behave in similar ways that are distinct from other sorts of pack animals?
Your arguments are well documented, Eman, and I do respect your ideas, but I dont quite see things as black and white as you do.
Iterations 1 - 3
I hope everyone is doing well this morning
He was better than the rest of them...that was worded poorly, I just wanted to make the point that i suddenly had a hard on for Russia because of what's his name..lol
Yep! Again, no r in the pronunciation.
It was designed to control women--and keep them in their place--far more than it does so with men.
Jim McDougal, Mary Mahoney, Vince Foster, Ron Brown, Victor Raiser, Paul Tulley, Ed Willey, Jerry Parks, James Bunch, James Wilson, Kathy Ferguson, Bill Shelton, Gandy Baugh, Florence Martin, Suzanne Coleman, Paula Grober, Danny Casolaro, Paul Wilcher, Jon Parnell Walker, Barbara Wise, Charles Meissner, Stanley Heard, Barry Seal, Johnny Lawhorn, Stan Huggins, Hershell Friday, Kevin Ives, Don Henry, Keith Coney, Keith McMaskle, Gregory Collins, Jeff Rhodes, James Milan, Richard Winters, William Barkley, Scott Reynolds, Brian Hanley, Tim Sabel, William Robertson, William Densberger, Robert Kelly, Gary Rhodes,Steve Willis, Robert Williams, Conway LeBleu,and Todd McKeehan.
The earliest version says "abuse themselves with mankind (i.e. homosexuality)" The original word is ???????????? (sodomite, homosexual and it applies to both male and female sodomites). The version you have isn' the earliest nor is it an earlier version it's NIV. The earliest is KJV. And again you're trying to play with words in your last statement, I said and I say again the Bible doesn't call mixed fibers a sin or an abomination, just says don't do it. You're trying to justify your self with all your practiced arguments but it won't work. You stand before God as a LOST person.
Might have to put elevators in the tree stands if it doesn't go well, oh well already have a fridge up there in case you drop in or out or well who knows with you! lol
you can't use the bible as proof that the bible is legit. That is called circular reasoning.
He got reward, heaven and eternal joy.
...and other places.
hey I was responding to his statement
Want to make anachronistic primitive god twaddle seem more interesting? Season it with quantum!
Ben Franklin, 1766 London, speaking about a British WELFARE ACT: ?There is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken and insolent?.by giving them a dependence?.Repeal that law and you will see a change in their manners.?
Your problem is stupidity. Singapore is over ninety percent Chinese. Switzerland is mostly white. Crime is caused mostly by poverty. Fatherlessness is sometimes a factor. But if you think that fatherless boys don't have role models. Then you are wrong to some degree. Single parent homes with adequate incomes don't have crime problems. Environment has a lot to do with it also.
Your opinion on it isn't relevant. It's the sacred text for Jewish people, and people with more power and stronger opinions than that haven't convinced them to give it up.
It would not be the first time Christians preached one thing and practised another.
He?s pretty quick to denounce Middle East wars. Do you really think he?s a neocon? I think he?d name the jew in a second, if he didn?t think it would end his career. He?s against open borders. He?s against big government. He?s against Zionist wars. What makes you think he leans neocon? Seriously, I?m interested in your opinion on this.
Accepting people as individuals requires too much thinking.
saying no, is not a valid substantive argument... explain yourself..
Have you come to terms with the fact that maybe you have lied?
Not that I know of. If so, how?
Evasion is the language of duplicity.
He was a deist in private, but a Christian in public.
Yes, one who thinks those two ladies are BOTH extremely attractive.
You were never polite.
Except scientific metaphors are designed to clarify and religious metaphors are designed to confuse.
""We should take rights from people I disagree with"doesn't exactly set you up as a paragon of liberal virtue."