I am an atheist though I was agnostic for most of my life. I just get so tired of hearing how "unerring" the bible is when it has been changed and/or rewritten thousands of times. This OP is about morality/immorality and objectivity/subjectivity. But how can any Christians claim objective morality when they keep changing the target and then claim it hasn't changed. Sorry, that "situational ethics" which those same Christians completely detest and denounce, well, except when they are the ones doing it. I think they are, simply, lying.
Interpretation can vary based upon what one takes ambiguous terms like "false prophets," "fine fruit," "righteousness," etc. to mean. They have meant and can mean very different things within different traditions and worldviews. Meanings also tend to change with somewhat time (as indicated by Tokyo's comment).
It is my understanding that on August 26, 1900, god wrote, "Nietzche is dead. Nietzche remains dead."
First, it is only your arrogance that presumes to know what's in my mind.
Nope. Not at all. Trump pushed for a 90 day ban on specific countries who behave as you see in the picture. The same people flooding Europe, the same people blowing themselves up, the same people knifing other people in the UK, the same people running people over, the same people holding the same belief. You choose to ignore that and keep pivoting to Trump being bigoted when his concerns are justified.
You would think that his will and lawyers would have made sure she and the family got what they were entitled to.
HD is making a business decision. Many companies pulled up stakes and took their business to repressive regimes, like China, Mexico, Vietnam, etc. etc. who pay their workers pennies an hour. And all under the watchful eye of all previous administrations. Then they sell their goods back to the hugest consumer market on the planet, America. Thereby cutting out the USA producer. Trump says "NO MORE!"
I think he chooses to ignore
You are making a fool of yourself here OU.
What a weirdo!
Oh no of course not, it's not like the Jewish banking clans all united against him and funded his enemies, or that he forced all Jews in his domains to take last names so as to identify themselves, or tried to reform their Satanic cult by decree, or anything that might have turned them against him like forcing them out of their shtetls and making them dress properly and bathe themselves like normal human beings, and it's not like the Talmud teaches undying hatred for all "inferior goyim" simply for existing to begin with.
And changing it up once again....
I doubt it. Mossad's mandate has its limits. Besides, you have all manner of spy vs. spy activity afoot...
Lmao..Sit down...Be Humble
You wanted to compare our poor to those living in other first world countries with expansive social welfare programs. Talking about ?living space? lol.
yeah, right, you would kick that lions ass toot sweet
Hil, plays for keeps.
Clearly you're unfamiliar with what Christ actually said. The Matthew reference is about DIVORCE, not a treatise on all types of marriage.
Nope your misconception is thinking you?re not in a religion when you are. Atheism meets all of the criteria to be a religion.
So is God, sin, miracle, etc. also a metaphor?
And facts don't change regardless of pews.
Aristotle says a virtue is always balanced between two vices. So courage is balanced between foolhardiness and cowardice.
Agreed. I mean.....