It is up to the government to decide given that you agree that our parents teaching us is inadequate. If all parents could teach the same thing then the government wouldn't need to step in, until then it should be taught in school.
No... that's literally not what he did. You have it backwards.
Sure. But there are reasons for this. If you want, give me an example in a dictionary, and I'll explain why this is done, how it could be done better, or something along those lines. You won't open up something like that Stanford Enclyopedia of Philosophy and find any of the definitions to be circular. You won't look at definitions that scientists use in papers and find them to be circular.
Stop? Let it be....
And poke at your closely held beliefs, come on Cav Liberals are the devil we know.
HK. I, as a secular humanist with a globalist perspective intentionally was applying the more ?generic? term to appeal to all the Earthlings of all tribes.
Yes, I would be ok with all of the above if it were a voucher program where parents can choose where to send their kids.
Because, what God went through we all do..in a sense. God had to deal with people trying to do it on their own, independence from the very start. The mosaic law was added it says, to get out this independence. We can't do it on our own. That's why, that book is only a book God could have written. The 'old man' has to go first, before the new way can even begin to settle in. The old testament is old covenant contract, but was by faith Abe did it. That's never changed. The mosaic labeled sin to teach we can't do it on our own...people want to. The new us God doing for us, but then turning it all over to us, as a gift. Its all about that partnership though, like it could have been in the garden..God and His creation in a mutual partnership. That's all God ever wanted, according to the text. That's what God gets too. Its those that want the relationship. The ones that don't are weeded out, but not by Gods doing but our own if we choose that.
He does not have a "right" to use the power of the office of the presidency to threaten economic retaliation against the NFL unless they act as a proxy for the government and engage in an activity expressly prohibited.
I'll tell him. (writing a few notes for myself...)
I'm on the fence in regard to Trump's direct collusion. But I think there is tons of legitimate corruption an obstruction of people in his orbit as well as Trump himself. I will accept whatever end this investigation comes down with.
Do vegans consider eating seeds as devouring unborn plant children?