So you are basically saying that most all of the New Testament has to be thrown out and you will only accept the parts that you cherry picked out of it.
Fine if all it takes is to copy and paste Psalm 82, that is easy enough.
Wunderbar... more meat to go around and feed the cycle of heartless inhumanity as if it weren?t bad enough... smh I?m glad I?m a mermaid and don?t have to claim any ties to you squishy meat bags called humans.
For someone who spends so much time dedicated to perpetuating the stories of that fantasy man, you certainly are confused.
And the valid evidence to support this claim is ......
Don?t straw man, stay on topic. You have yet to give a good reason for churches to be tax exempt. There are plenty of non-profit orgs that aren?t 501c3, and pay taxes. Charity work should be the only qualifying tax exemption, all you?ve said so far is ?churches don?t make a profit?...
Twitter and Google were outed already for not hiring conservatives. When conservatives complained I shrugged. You don't have a right to work at Google.
I am revolving around the internet declaring Jesus Christ risen from the dead. testifying that I am a witness of his resurrection by the manifestation of his Spirit to me after hearing and believing the testimony of Jesus Christ whose love is demonstrated in his crucifixion death burial and resurrection from the dead..
HA! This morning after I had put my make-up on I watched one where the woman dressed as the mascot of her son's school and surprised him, AND of course I started crying. I was like "SHIT! MY MASCARA!"
Should look at it rationally...in the situation you describe, it's understandable that he didn't call.
I had to do it for me. I need to put it out in the universe as much as possible. :-)
Unfortunately if the older is not wiser, we learn from them too.
It its a mix. I think God allows these 'breadcrumbs' to exist, lead people down the path they choose. Its deliberate, given up to their imaginations. Why? Because it sucks when you force a relationship :)
Awww, I thought that the first paragraph was better than the second ;)
We have anti-segregation laws, laws against discriminating against POC in housing and employment. We have laws that got rid of the ban against interracial marriage. Should we get rid of those laws too?
Where did they say they identified as ?nothing??
I miss you too triple gorgeous. I have a little music thread I run. The links in my profile. Visit anytime. I?m mostly there on the weekends
Looks like you have a very confused rationale.
You need the old testament to understand the new. The new is hidden in the old. The old is revealed in the new.
Actually I believe it to be British.
Thank you for your thoughts, mike. You may want to raed my second pose which clarifys so much of what you are questioning.
Wow that image. xD It looks like a romance cover...
They're treated more harshly by the court system? Tell that to the girl that was raped by Brock Turner, knowing he only spent 3 months in jail.
Only in the religious sense.
No. The Constitution says that naturalization is defined by congress. And if you look at the constitution after the fact: you are a citizen if you have been born here. You can't hold foreign citizenship and be protected. Open borders do not work. If you want to be an american citizen, come legally: and then you will be entitled to equality. They are not protected by the laws. Hear about the recent SCOTUS controversy?
I know, but she and others think this win means they said he could not serve gays. They went out of their way to make it clear they did not rule such
I looked and I looked and I looked for a Fuck to give..... But I can't find one ........
LOL LOL LOL!!
You forget it was a child who allegedly committed this crime
Being on top does not mean gravity will do its thing
Surely the safest bet would be a 'one-way' SETI? IE, ears open, mouth shut. I see considerable potential danger in attracting the attention of an alien superintelligence. However, becoming aware of one through listening on all known channels might teach us something about them that could come in useful.
To me, it's pretty simple: Darwinism is not applicable to individuals, but it is perfectly applicable to social groups. History books are choke-full of examples of competing / cooperating societies. From that perspective, the society with better-fit morale over long-term wins this competition. No, we cannot state for sure what this "better fit" actually is - but Golden Rule seems like a pretty good starting point.
Umm...the scientific explanation of a "species" is organism which can procreate and make copies of itself. This would be expected in evolution, that species would evolve, and not be able to procreate with it's predecessors.
Judgemental? Not of