If you stopped talking after the first four words you would be correct and look like less of a tard....of course ya could have stopped after 8 and been even more accurate but just as big a douchbag....by the time ya got done yer jus a weak ass tard like ya always been....meh....I did invite the bitchers too....??
You're looking to agree with something but like mathematics, objectivity doesn't need subjective agreement in order for it to be true.
ya, the bible shouldn't be discussed on the religion channel. How dumb!
Shes lucky shes cute and loveable, otherwise I don't know how I'd be able to deal with her little monster ways.
Woohoo! You have the power now.??
What happened to the money I paid into Medicare for over 50 years, BEFORE I could use the program, does't that count?
Lois, the baker isn't "fighting for their rights" -- the baker
Well, I'm great with that seeing as how God doesn't exist.
f=ma, but a force can be oriented in different directions which leads to a different outcome while all being the exact same f=ma. This means that directions are something other than nature.
People (not limited to atheists) support the theory of evolution. If a better scientific theory came along that disproved evolution, we would move on to that.
True but you also have to see your parents as warm and open and feel comfortable going to them if you need them. It's hard to feel that way if you see them as dictators.
Not necessarily. We already know that science most definitely disproves the Biblical account of creation.
instant fight topic, just add water:
Why would you want to hide them? Paint them red and make them a fashion statement!
The President deserves respect he won an incredibly exciting campaign
Yes, I agree 100%. That's the reason why I keep pushing the similarities here on this channel. The reason why religious faith is deemed 'blind' is really not the reasons folks here tend to think. They assume its because it has zero evidence to support, that you blindly step off a cliff etc. That's not faith at all..its luck or chance. Faith always has degree of evidence...always. Its referred to as blind because this evidence you are calculating is not seen...yet. Evidence begets evidence not seen. Its how we all function. In the case of the text, scripture...its a real relationship. Just like being in one you touch, see, etc you base some faith on character, on the person...but it's still past tested evidence. Its just indirect. You build up a more thorough knowledge of the person over many many years. It becomes impenetrable, and that's why Jesus actually said..blessed or empowered is the one who believes but doesn't see physically. Its all faith, but revealed knowledge thru circumstantial evidence results in a far stronger, more elaborate faith. Paul wrote 2/3 of the new test because he, out of the rest had to go off the text, the Word revealed...like we all now do.
Were you there? Of course not. Back up your claim that atheists were hard to find 2000 years ago.
I know you're inserting a bit of snark as dictated by your tendencies but it's wasted on me as I'm no Christian however, the Judas gospel isn't even purported to have been written by Judas.
Your claim is the same as claiming that the universe had to be as it is.
Not really, we can make assumptions based upon the interaction of the radiation with the detector, so after applying the right correction factors, you're really measuring the amount of ionizing radiation at the detector. But with radiation. . .like most things. . .there is no competing vector. A columnated gamma beam coming in from the left doesn't affect the general field source you're measuring. You just end up with a higher reading in the spot where they intersect. Radioactivity and radiation are two very different things, by the way.
I care, the people have been told God does not exist, everyone knows instinctively how to love
Of course there's the other side. You're just refusing to look at it. Abortion supporters need to put themselves in the role of the unborn. If you appreciate your life, your family, and all the wonders and joys that existence has to offer, why would you want to deny that experience to someone on the threshold of their birth? If consciousness and sentience were to be temporarily removed from you for a few month, would you want someone to end your life simply because you pose a temporary inconvenience?
One of my favourite musings on religion comes from a Sci-Fi series.
Same old canard, and yet another white-right Trumpoid reveals no substance, only snark.