Science deneirs will deny pretty much all other facts too.
Whatever you say
The fossil record is pretty clear on this but an interesting idea none the less. Not sure why this would alter the beliefs of any person of faith or anyone who does not believe in a religion though.
Again, science doesn't proclaim absolute truth. It goes with objective evidence. I'm not sure what you are referring to, but science goes with the best explanation and evidence available at that given point. If all the scientists agree on objective experiments and results, it doesn't mean that it is an absolute truth, just an objective one. If it turns out to be incorrect later on, it doesn't mean it was a lie, it just means they were wrong. The only thing that will fix that is more objective evidence, facts, tests, etc..... You will never ever get this type of improvement with religion.
OK :-) cannot argue with that!
I have no issues with mpl999 whatsoever. All good in my books.
No you did not post any context that proves human men are not called gods
Let's shoot them some ideas, Tex! : )
Reach over with your left hand and take the pulse of your right arm. If it is beating, folks will want to say that you are alive. You ARE Universe.
To many forums and sometimes to late at night makes for the occasional scrambled comment, but you seek to make a point from a single hangnail in the above comment which I corrected to an extent.
I have a connection with Mo cause we both love pizza with pineapple XD
spoken like a desperate monkey.
It's cute when Bob G tries to comment on disqus.
We care because you constantly interfere with everyone else.
Different, yes. But morality has to do with right and wrong ... good and bad. So, there is better and worse. So, you believe some races' morality is better or worse than others based on DNA?? I don't agree with that.