Honest. That's why the background check after the third date. "Seemed" won't cut it.
I think you overlooked the point of bivalence and the meaning of ipso facto. If you claim an assertion of something's existence is false, you have as a consequence of this claimed that the assertion of its non-existence is true.
you broadcast things over the airwaves?
Duh, the God claim.
Argumentum ad populum.
That's a bit dishonest *if* you are aware that in 1996 the Dickey amendment prohibited the CDC from funding research into gun deaths, which effectively prevented them from tracking how many people died each year due to guns, various kinds of guns, situations involving guns, demographics, etc.
Like an equal partner.
There are clean animals and there are unclean animals. 2 of every animal was directed but a higher percentage of "clean" animals was also directed. God was simply insuring that of all the animals the "clean" ones were better represented.
I think he's talented, i'd have to see the movie to see if Tyson is made into some low-class hero to the masses, that's what I fear about a movie of him. Then again, he's already popular from "The Hangover" movies. Athletes kind of are forgiven most of all, their extreme physicality and raw nature of what they do is almost a built-in excuse for excessive and violent behavior.
Hope he goes broke because no one wants to buy screws from a bigot.
You don't want links because there are thousands that prove you wrong. Not sorry about that.
good point. i'll just treat her and the issue the way i'd want to be treated
Which one multiverse, random vacuum, infinite past?
This is the thing, if there was no war then Germany would not of expanded as Hitler had no intention of 'conquering the world' - he stock piled arms because he knew what going against the (((banks))) would do
You said: "of course He can", but you scrupulously avoided saying how. Explaining how NOT to do it does not tell us how to do it.
ive stopped conversing as of now!
Just as I suspected. You asked for peer review research from scientific journals. I provide such research and you reject it, not because it isn't peer reviewed (Journal of Human Sexuality is a peer-reviewed publication) but because of who publishes it. NARTH is a science based organization unaffiliated with any church or religious group.
Then maybe you'll like this one more, Doc...