Criticizing a religion or keeping that religion "in check" is what a society does and often does well with the cooperation of those within that religion. How do you convince a religious group about a discrepancy as an outsider? You dont friggin call their beliefs "myths" and their God "Sky fairy" for starters...you ask them the questions, you engage them and go into those conversations seeking middle ground.
Isn't that just a wonderful sound? Music to my ears. They will have to stuff their arrogance for a while.
When was this like 3 weeks later ? Are your that in the dark about it
Was there ever a "Friends" or "Seinfeld" episode where there was a struggle to pay the rent and utilities? ??????
The business of saving lives and serving others. Sounds pretty charitable to me.
Here is some more
Contrived opposition on a global scale. They're all actors on the world's stage.
Wonderland, and I've got an E ticket!
Yeah, I agree, but we don't know they don't have it. Just because they have a nice house, plane etc...doesnt mean a thing, unless you are seriously claiming to know his heart. It says to give it all up, but that's within. Love the world, lose it etc.
My position is humans do good things and bad things. SOme do more good things, others do more bad things
I have no problem with people doing what they like.
To make an anti-venom, you first need the venom.
I believe Obama's drone policy was a good thing because the world needs fewer children. These kids would have grown up without the Internet and the benefits of secular humanism anyway. Besides, it helped to grow terrorists and terrorists are good for the economy. It drives employment in fields like the military industrial complex and keeps Americans working.
Thanks. It's a lovely home but it's way too big for us now.
Still waiting for your to provide your examples. Your opinions are not enough.
Mostly in the Spirit but on a rare occasion you can meet Him in the earthly realm also.
Yes, I agree. It is a fact that is your opinion
You cannot help yourself.
I think I can sum up "Christian Privilege" as I see it in the United States pretty simply:
To muddy the waters. Once you concede that circumcision (the medical procedure) is beneficial, he'll say that that circumcision (Bris) is beneficial. This is a setup to an equivocation fallacy.
Talking like that Johan will not get me to communicate. Too ground rooted that I am .?? ?? ??
I don't know what that means. Some people have the opinion that certain races are superior to others. You're saying that if I find that abhorrent and cease contact with them, I'm in the wrong? That makes no sense. We are allowed to take a stand sometimes.
Are you infuring something? It's morning and I have time before work. Either this or something or real life stuff.
This is why players kneel.
"its the customers art" You are delusional beyond repair if you think that
Neat. That doesn't explain *why* I would want to emulate that example. Letting yourself get taken advantage of or forcing yourself to be a doormat isn't moral, it's stupid.
Nope. The challenge was out there for years. No nutter ever won the million bucks. Not even close.
They banned the satii, they'll soon abrogate the law against homosexuals.
I see a distinct difference between engaging someone in good faith, and then giving up in frustration, and going into an OP looking to get angry.
Oh no! My BF hasn't cheated. He sowed his wild oats before me.
Yup.... Sure will......
None of those are first century. They are all second century.